Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Kerry doesnt have an ad on TV by tomorrow showing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
fishface Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 02:46 AM
Original message
If Kerry doesnt have an ad on TV by tomorrow showing
smirk making this statement, he damn well deserves to lose. He's got that punkbitch by the balls..even Ron Reagan said on MSNBC right after the debate that the clip of him saying it will be shown on TV by tomorrow.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gardenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think Kerry should let the news media run with it first. It may not be
necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think he already has an ad with that
Edited on Thu Oct-14-04 02:48 AM by nothingshocksmeanymo
More likely than not, the DNC will run it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. This Is What The Whores Do...
There's blood in the water now and any flub the manchild makes will get play. While it won't be to our satisfaction, it will be there. CNNservative jumped right on it, since they knew if they didn't someone else did.

These assholes blew it open when Chenney pulled that "I Never Met You" crap on Edwards...it was such a blatant lie that it tore a broadside into what was left of this regime's credibility. The manchild cemented it on Friday with not being able to accept responsibility.

Tonight, Bunnypants looked like a beat puppy. Kerry did what he needed to do...short, simple, direct, human, humble. Bunnypants was so outclassed, now he's been so wounded that even if he were to be reselected he'd be open to a second term of ridicule and second guessing based on his faltering performances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. all they have to do is
to show the clips of bush* saying "dead or alive"

then saying "...don't think about him much..."

followed by his denial-lie "Gosh, I just don't think I ever said I'm not worried about Osama bin Laden. It's kind of one of those exaggerations."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. Ask and ye shall receive.
Edited on Thu Oct-14-04 05:31 AM by sofa king
http://www.democrats.org/idontknow/index.html

Edit: but there's a lot more to it than that. Check out this list of suspected al Qaeda attacks:

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0884893.html

Since the President stopped giving a shit in March of 2002, al Qaeda is suspected of having participated in sixteen attacks, killing over 600 people and injuring many more. They attacked six times in 2002--after Afghanistan was invaded. They attacked six times in 2003--after Iraq was invaded. They attacked four times this year, and the list shows that October and November are their busiest months.

Since the President stopped giving a shit about Osama bin Laden, al Qaeda is suspecting of committing twice as many terrorist acts as they had in their entire existence up to March, 2002.

What was the President doing to combat al Qaeda? Well, among other things, he http://salon.com/opinion/feature/2004/04/22/700million/index_np.html">diverted $700 million from the hunt for Osama--possibly in violation of the Constitution--to preparations for an invasion of Iraq. That invasion that had yet to be authorized; it was a plan which the President "didn't have on his desk" at the time.

John Kerry isn't fooling around with this. The figures show that al Qaeda has become stronger, not weaker, since September 11, 2001. The facts show that despite reguarly alarming the American public about it, he didn't do much about combating al Qaeda.

So the next time someone tries to laugh off that gaffe in front of you, you tell them that not only is Osama still loose, but al Qaeda is just as busy as it has been--since George Bush came to Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishface Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 05:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Sweet... now let's see it nationally on TV!
POUND THE LITTLE FUCK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demokatgurrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. He can't,they agreed
Edited on Thu Oct-14-04 04:39 AM by demokatgurrl
not to use debate footage in campaign ads. However he CAN quote him, and MoveOn can make the ad.

They could make an ad as redfringe said, and just use a Bush quote at the end, preferably in Kerry's voice; that would work well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishface Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 05:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. They won't need the debate footage.
They can show the footage of Carl Cameron (sp?) on Fox News right after the debate playing the clip and commenting on how Bush did actually say it . bwhahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC