Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's FDA Reproductive Committee to be run by faith healer?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 11:44 AM
Original message
Bush's FDA Reproductive Committee to be run by faith healer?
I just got this email from a woman friend in Ohio (does anyone know what it's about?):

"Just another reminder of why it is so important to vote for
Kerry/Edwards in 15 days ... and to do what you can to work towards a
Kerry victory in swing states.

This petition checks out -- it's not an urban legend. Please read, and
if you agree that fundamentalist religious beliefs and women's access
to contraception are a dangerous mix, sign and pass along ..."

"President Bush has announced his plan to select Dr. W.
David Hager to Head up the Food and Drug
Administration's (FDA) Reproductive Health Drugs
Advisory Committee. The committee has not met for more
than two years, during which time its charter lapsed.
As a result, the Bush Administration is tasked with
filling all eleven positions with new members.
This position does not require Congressional approval.
The FDA's Reproductive Health Drugs Advisory Committee
makes crucial decisions on matters relating to drugs
used in the practice of obstetrics, gynecology and
related specialties, including hormone therapy,
contraception, treatment for infertility, and medical
alternatives to surgical procedures for sterilization
and pregnancy termination.
Dr. Hager, the author of "As Jesus Cared for Women:
Restoring Women Then and Now." The book blends
biblical accounts of Christ healing Women with case
studies from Hager's practice. His views of productive
health care are far outside the mainstream for
reproductive technology. Dr. Hager is a practicing
OB/GYN who describes himself as "pro-life" and refuses
to prescribe contraceptives to unmarried women.
In the book Dr. Hager wrote with his wife, entitled
"Stress and the Woman's Body," he suggests that women
who suffer from premenstrual syndrome
should seek help from reading the bible and praying.
As an editor and contributing author of "The
Reproduction Revolution: A Christian Appraisal of
Sexuality Reproductive Technologies and the Family,"
Dr. Hager appears to have endorsed the medically
inaccurate assertion that the common birth Control
pill is an abortifacient.
We are concerned that Dr. Hager's strong religious
beliefs may color his assessment of technologies that
are necessary to protect women's lives or to preserve
and promote women's health.
Hager's track record of using religious beliefs to
guide his medical decision-making makes him a
dangerous and inappropriate candidate to serve as
chair of this committee. Critical drug public policy
and research must not be held hostage by antiabortion
politics. Members of this important panel should be
appointed on the basis of science and medicine,
rather than politics and religion. American women
deserve no less.
There is something you can do. Below is a letter to be
sent to the White House, opposing the placement of
Hager. Please copy all the text of This email and
paste it into a fresh email; then sign your name below
and SEND THIS TO EVERY PERSON YOU KNOW WHO IS
CONCERNED ABOUT WOMEN'S RIGHTS.
I oppose the appointment of Dr. W. David Hager to the
FDA Reproductive Health Drugs Advisory Committee.
Mixing religion and medicine is unacceptable in a
policy-making position. Using the FDA to promote a
political agenda is inappropriate and seriously
threatens women's health. Members of this important
panel should be appointed on the basis of science and
medicine, rather than politics and religion. American
women deserve no less.
Every 25th person please forward e-mail to
president@whitehouse.gov"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. It IS true! Even Snopes.com says so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yep. Jesus and the FDA.

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,361521,00.html

The guy who spearheaded the blocking of OTC sales of the morning after pill (after assuring people that his religious beliefs didn't preclude him from making sound policy decisions) for purely what he called 'social' reasons--- specifically saying that OTC Plan B Contraception had the potential to have the same kind of social impact as the availability of oral contraceptives did in the 1950s-- like that was a bad thing!


Essentially, this guy is pissed that women are able to take the pill at all, and if the pill was up for FDA approval today, he wouldn't let it be approved!

These folks are WAY out of control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aden_nak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. It reminds me of what George Carlin said on the subject.
"These conservatives are really something. They'll do anything to protect the unborn. ANYTHING for the unbord. But once you're born. . . YOU'RE ON YOUR OWN!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC