|
What if the "October surprise" turns out to be a the messy, clouded election itself? (A "November surprise" actually.)
- So many states have adopted paperless, buggy computerized voting systems which can´t be audited and don´t allow recounts.
- Florida is once again using phony felon lists to illegally block people from voting.
- Republicans have set up fake voter-registration drives, discarding Democratic registrations.
- Thousands of Rebublicans in Ohio are being paid to "challenge" people´s voter registrations, in an effort to suppress turnout.
If Bush comes in a close second, Rove will sue immediately (and send out his rent-a-mobs) - that´s his modus operandi.
If Kerry comes in a close second, thousands of disenfranchised voters will sue immediately - that´s their only hope of living in a constitutational democracy.
Even though the crisis in 2000 was small, just some lawyering and recounting, Republicans started panicking that just a few weeks of "not knowing" could a threat to our democracy, and we should just go with the guy Bush´s cousin at Fox called first, arguing we couldn´t afford to take the time to figure out who really won.
Could the Republicans be hoping for even more confusion this time (with maybe even some mayhem thrown in for good measure) - so they can again start panicking and argue that "for the good of the country" let´s just go with the incumbent?
Could that be the "surprise"?
If it is, how can we counter it?
|