Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

contact Howard Dean about tax-fairness

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 07:46 PM
Original message
contact Howard Dean about tax-fairness
Howard Dean said on Sunday night that he would offer a tax-fairness plan, but propose that it only be enacted after we have a balanced budget. He said previously a balanced-budget would take 6 years.

I don't think the middle-class wants to wait 6 years for tax-relief.

Ask the Dean campaign to lower the payroll tax-rate and raise the cap (lower taxes on the middle, raise taxes on the rich), so the plan is revenue-neutral and can be implemented promptly.

form to email Dean campaign:
http://www.deanforamerica.com/site/cg/index.html?type=page&pagename=resources_contact



(Currently, income above $87,000 is exempt from the payroll tax, but that cap has been raised before and can be raised, again).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. The cap IS raised...every year. It's $87,900 for 2004.
By the way, $88k IS middle class for many people...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Dean can propose raising it more than was planned so that
Dean can propose raising the cap more than was planned so that a lower-rate can take place promptly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, I know. I was just pointing out that the "middle class" would lose
on this, too.

Personally, I'm for the idea (I think I heard Kerry mention it) of exempting the first $10k from payroll taxes and eliminating the FICA cap.

It'd cost me money, but it would be going to the people who need it most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I agree with that Kerry tax proposal (nt)
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm Sorry, but a balanced budget is more important than personal income
Edited on Thu Jan-15-04 09:36 PM by Walt Starr
and the fact of the matter is, most Americans during the nineties felt it was more important to balance the budget and begin paying off the national debt than it is to get a tax cut.

I'm a hobbyist, my hobby being miniature wargaming. I'd love to spend thousands of dollars on miniatures and modeling equipment this month. My budget won't allow it. Other things in my budget are more important. Personal gratification must take a back seat to the greater good of a balanced budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. When the Republicans run ads saying that Howard Dean wants to
When the Republicans run ads saying that Howard Dean wants to raise your taxes by $1,900, he better have a better answer than "there was no middle-class tax-cut" or that he would lower middle-class taxes beginning 6 years after taking office.

He needs a tax-fairness proposal which is revenue-neutral, so it can be implemented right away.

Raise taxes on the rich and lower them on the middle-class, in some form.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the populist Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Dean's compulsion about balancing the budget
isn't based on sound economic thought. You're not supposed to balance the budget by cutting spending and raising taxes when you've still got an unemployment problem. Gephardt is right: Our first priority is the unemployment, not the budget. But then again, Gephardt is a man whose allegiance of the worker does not need to be questioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. kick
kick

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC