Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Kuttner of American Prospect: Convention battle to Clark?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
snyttri Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 05:55 AM
Original message
Robert Kuttner of American Prospect: Convention battle to Clark?
Boston Marathon
Will there be a race to the finish this summer at the Democratic National Convention? It could happen.

By Robert Kuttner
Web Exclusive: 1.15.04

<snip>

With proportional representation, this dynamic peels off a few delegates here and a few there. The front-runner could well come into the convention (stagger in?) with fewer than forty percent of the delegates. The Democrats also have 715 "super-delegates" who are elected officials and party leaders. But these delegates have no consensus favorite, either.

If I'm right, what does this portend? For the Democrats, it's part bad news, part good news. The bad news is that the circular firing squad goes on another six months. The good news is that the race starts generating real excitement.

With this scenario, the fragmented delegate count produces several possible permutations. After the first convention ballot, delegates can switch their votes, and then the bargaining starts. If Dean comes in with, say, 35 percent of the delegates, Clark with 30, and Gephardt with 25, we could get a Dean-Clark ticket; or Clark-Dean; or Clark-Gephardt, and so on. The one with the delegate edge coming in is not necessarily the nominee since it takes fifty percent to be nominated.

The winner? The most likely nominee in my view is Wesley Clark, even if he doesn't have the most delegates on the first ballot, because delegates would turn to the candidate with the best chance of beating Bush. Clark, in turn, would be under heavy pressure to invite Dean onto the ticket as his running mate, because Dean enthusiasts would be inclined to bolt if their man had the most delegates but was denied the nomination. An alternative is Dick Gephardt, who could strengthen the ticket in the battleground states of the Midwest, but a Clark-Gephardt would increase the risk of Deaniacs going away mad.

http://www.prospect.org/webfeatures/2004/01/kuttner-r-01-15.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. I do not understand
I do not C how gephardt adds to the ticket. Other than Union endorsements, there R great pictures of him smiling away @ squatter in the Rose Garden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Scenario I See Is Clark & Kerry
with Dean having the least votes in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. more likely a compromise will NOT be clark, dean or gephardt, but edwards
its no compromise when you cede the victory to your major opponents. all one has done there is lose. but if the top three are stymied, then an alternative candidate can be the compromise.

actually i am hoping the convention is hung, with al gore as the eventual candidate, with edwards or clark as the vp candidate.

no one has given bush more hell than gore, no one has the broad-based and instant support gore has and no one can take it to bush like gore can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Edwards may nothave any delegates
I think the point of the article is that some of these guys will have delegeats. Edwards won't have many if things go the way they are going.

I do not want to see Gore be the nominee. He has had his chance. I have seen him since and I remember every reason why I didn't like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. That would be incredible, but I am not sure if I can take another 6 months
of this. I doubt it would happen. Terry M. wants this over by March 3. There would be a lot of politicking going on to end the race in March. It would be an incredible thing to see if it happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC