Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Moore: "Lieberman in the wrong party" and why Clark is the man on CNN.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 12:36 PM
Original message
Moore: "Lieberman in the wrong party" and why Clark is the man on CNN.
BLITZER: One of America's most outspoken liberals has announced his choice for the Democratic presidential nomination. And it may come as something as a surprise. Instead of joining other liberal Democrats supporting Howard Dean or, let's even say, Dennis Kucinich, the filmmaker Michael Moore says he'll be voting for Wesley Clark, who is sometimes accused of being a Republican in disguise. In fact, that's what Howard Dean says all the time now. So why is Michael Moore doing this?

He's joining us now live from New York to tell us.

I've got to tell you, Michael, I was pretty surprised. Why do you like Wesley Clark?

MICHAEL MOORE, FILMMAKER/AUTHOR: First of all, I like him as a human being. I think he's a very decent and honorable person.

I trust him. He seems very down to earth. And I like where he comes from. And, most of all, I think, as "The New York Times" pointed out last week, he's actually slightly to the left of Dean. And this is something I think a lot of people don't realize, especially probably a lot of young people. Women, African-Americans, labor people, should really take a close look at this guy, because I did and I really liked what I saw.

BLITZER: I read the article that you posted on your Web site. I got the sense, though, that, for practical political reasons, the main reason you like Wesley Clark is that you think he can beat George W. Bush more than the other Democratic candidates.

MOORE: Well, that is a very good reason. I think certainly you have the best chance with him.

As you know, and you've pointed out many times, Wolf, this election is going to really come down to 15 states and a few percentage points and those states. And you have to ask yourself, who has the best chance of winning these states, Florida, West Virginia, Arizona, Nevada, Ohio, Missouri? When you put it like that, I think he definitely has the best chance.

But it's not just a matter of strategy for me, because, honestly, I think, you know, other candidates could also beat Bush. I think Bush is beatable. That's my main position. And I'll support whoever the candidate is.

(CROSSTALK)

MOORE: But I think we're going to have the best chance with Clark.

But my reasons for supporting him are the things that he stands for. He's going to end this war. He's going to change the tax rate, so that families of four who make under $50,000 a year are not going to have to pay federal income tax. And the rich are going to have to pay an extra 5 percent.

(CROSSTALK)

BLITZER: I also noticed in the article that you wrote, you -- explaining why you like Wesley Clark so much, you said this, "He is clearly not from Park Avenue." Well, we all know Howard Dean was born on Park Avenue. Was that a swipe at Howard Dean? What do you have against Howard Dean?

MOORE: Nothing.

It was more what I have against Park Avenue. It was not meant to be a swipe at Dean. Look, I think Dean's a good guy. What's really been decent about Wesley Clark is that he's not participated in this kind of mud-slinging that the other candidates have. And I think I'd like to participate in that tone and not throw mud at Dean and not bring up things that I think -- look, you could say so many things about any of the candidates, how -- positions they've taken that I don't like or haven't liked in the past, how they've changed their minds, things they've been involved in.

When I hear Dean say that he won't cut a dime out of the Pentagon budget, that's inexcusable. But I also believe he's the kind of person you could possibly move along some day to a better position. So...

(CROSSTALK)

BLITZER: I want you to clarify another thing you said that was intriguing to me in the piece. You said, "I will work enthusiastically for any of the non-Lieberman eight who might get the nomination."

MOORE: Yes.

BLITZER: Now, what exactly does that mean?

MOORE: Well, for a long time, I've been in the anyone-but- Lieberman camp. And I think a lot of people are in that same camp.

The point being is that the other candidates -- of course, now with Moseley Braun out, it's now the non-Lieberman seven -- all the Democrats running, you could say something good about all of them. They all have good position on many of the issues. We're very fortunate this year to have this crop of candidates.

I just happen to think Clark is the best among them, best on the issues, best for the working people of this country, best to end this war, and the best to communicate this message to where I come from, in middle America. This is a gift that the Democratic Party has been given. We have a four-star general, top of his class at West Point, a Rhodes scholar. And he's going to go out there and tell middle America what we need to do in terms of cutting the Pentagon budget, of standing up for the rights of working people, affirmative action, nondiscrimination against gays and lesbians.

(CROSSTALK)

MOORE: Go down the whole list, he's extremely strong on these issues.

BLITZER: I assume if Lieberman for some reason were to get the nomination, you would support him, though, over Bush, is that right?

MOORE: It would take a lot of medication, Wolf.

(LAUGHTER)

BLITZER: What do you have against Joe Lieberman?

MOORE: Well, he's running in the wrong party. Lieberman is kind of like a liberal to moderate Republican. You know, he's Bush-light. And God bless him, but he just doesn't really belong in this party.

BLITZER: All right, Michael Moore explaining why he likes Wesley Clark so much. Thanks for joining us.

MOORE: Thank you for having me on.

BLITZER: You and Madonna now are in the same camp.

MOORE: Hey, just to hear those two names in the same sentence, you've made my day, Wolf.

(LAUGHTER)

BLITZER: Michael Moore and Madonna both support Wesley Clark.

Thanks very much, Michael, for that.

MOORE: Thank you very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
windansea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. very good MM
funny line about Madonna!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. He makes a very good point
This election is going to come down to the swing states. We need a candidate that can take the swing voters in the swing states.
I think Wesley clark is the man to do it, and he can move farther to the left than Clinton or dean or Gebhardt because of his unimpeachable military record, which gives him a certain credibility when cutting military budgets and setting security policy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Moore is such a good judge of charactrer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Yes, I guess he is
Bush is President because of a theft and voter fraud.

The plot only succeeded because Gore had an election that was his to lose, and he did it.

If he had even managed to win his home state of Tennessee we wouldn't be looking at 500 dead Americans (and nobody knows or even seems to care how many dead Iraqi's) today.

Gore was never the man to back in a bar fight, only the guy off to the side holding someone else's coat. He never should have been our nominee in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Lieberman: GOP's Useful Idiot
Edited on Fri Jan-16-04 12:48 PM by Tempest
Lieberman made a statement criticizing Clark about Clark's Iraq war stance based upon something posted on Drudge's web site.

It turns out Drudge lied about what Clark said and fabricated statements attributed to Clark.

See talkingpointsmemo.com for details.

Lieberman hurt the party more than he knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. Joe should have known better - member of the committee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukla Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. What does Michael Moore know?
He is hardly one to accuse somebody of being in the wrong party after backing Nader in 2000. He is way out of the mainstream and way to the left politically. His endorsement is the kiss of death in my opinion.

Joe Lieberman is a fine Democrat. I am suspicious of anybody Michael Moore would endorse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Kukla Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Please provide documentation
Lieberman does not stand with Bush at every turn. That generalization is inaccurate at best. In fat, where most issues are concerned Lierbman has been opposed to Bush.

He stood with Bush on the IWR. Half of the Democratic field did the same. He made the right decision. It was what was best for the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Here is documentation re Lieberman's use of Drudge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukla Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. That is not "standing with Bush at every turn"
That is politics as usual and every campaign is involved in this sort of thing.

Please, if the accusation that Lieberman stands with Bush at every turn is made, I would expect documentation can be provided where Lieberman has stood with Bush with each and every issue that was brought up last year.

In fact, I can disprove the generalized statement with a single link.

http://www.eagletribune.com/news/stories/20030123/FP_004.htm

WARNING: I am unsure of the political bent of the periodical I just linked to. I use it as an example of at least one time where Lieberman is critical of Bush and therefore prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the generalization of "Lieberman stands with bush at every turn" is inaccurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. I was providing documentation for Lieberman using Drudge against Clark
Not for Joe standing with Bush at every turn. He does that too often, but by no means always.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukla Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. Thank you.
I agree with you, Drudge is a sorry excuse of a journalist to use as a source. I am surprised Joe Lieberman would use him. I thought he would be above that sort of thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. Lieberman voted for
The tax cuts
Patriot Act
$87 Bill.
Death penalty for minors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukla Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Keep going
You must provide the documentation on everything for your initial assertion to be factually accurate. you shouldn't bother, though, since I provided a link showing at least one time when Lieberman stood against Bush thus refuting your assertion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #29
42. okay so you've proved that Lieberman only supports Bush most of the time

so I still don't like him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukla Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Your assertion may also be a generalization
If we go by the ratings of conservative and liberal organizations, your assertion is also factually inaccurate. "Most of the time" would mean greater than fifty percent.

Please provide documentation that Lieberman stood with Bush more than fifty percent of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I think he is an Independent, you know independent thinking
His endorsement to any Democratic Candidate is a good thing. It takes some work to spin it otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eissa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. What's wrong with being to the left?
I was disappointed with his Nader endorsement, but other than that, Moore has really devoted himself to progressive causes. And many of us in the party feel as he does regarding Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Salviati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. My take on Joe
Is he belongs in the party, his voting record is plenty good enough to be head and shoulders better than any republican. He is in SERIOUS need of an attitude adjustment though, and being that he is a conservitive democrat, I don't think that he belongs in the party leadership to the extent that he would be guiding the future course of the party...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukla Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I consider Joe Lieberman a moderate Democrat
Zell Miller would be an example of a Conservative Democrat. Even Breaux is far more conservative than Lieberman.

Lieberman is a left leaning moderate on nearly every issue. The IWR vote could be something to point towards a conservative bent, however, half of the current field voted in favor of the IWR and quite frankly, a majority of this nation supports those who were in favor of that vote.

I don't see this party being capable of winning unless it either nominates somebody who voted in favor of the IWR or has a vice presidential candidate who voted in favor of the IWR. Anything else will be political suicide for the democratic Party, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eissa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Respectfully disagree
The public supports those who voted for the war, and the war in general, because they were lied to. The truth has been revealed -- we just have to keep brining it up and hammering it to the public to get them to understand how evil this administration is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukla Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I keep hearing about the "lied to" thing
I haven't seen anything more than there was a rush to do something when the administration did not have all of the facts.

Please, provide documentation for your assertions that the American public has been lied to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Oh that is funny
Seriously... ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukla Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Laughing is not documentation
Please, recommend some reading. I've heard the accusations. I've seen no real evidence there were lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Is Documentation documentation?
See the message below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Read Ted Kennedy's Speech
given this week...

Where have you been?

Did you miss Ted's speech?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukla Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. No, I haven't seen Teddy's speech
Do you have a link?

Sorry, I haven't been really involved at all. Just watching the news, mostly CNN. I don't get more than about an hour of news each day. I'm too busy working most of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Quote by Dick Cheney pre-war
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction."
Dick Cheney
August 26, 2002

And there are no WMD. Cheney might have engaged in self-deception when saying this: but that means that he lied to himself as well as to the American public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukla Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. You've got to have more than this
That quote and your argument do not look good for the adminsitration and certainly supports the assertion. Please, give me more. This is the sort of thing I've begun turning to the internet for and I simply do not get on my television news and local newspaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Of course I have more than this
It's everywhere, and easy to find. Here is a large compilation of similar direct quotes from Administration officials regarding the Iraq war, most of which have been belied by reality.

http://billmon.org.v.sabren.com/archives/000172.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukla Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. My gosh!
I had no idea things were like this. I need to research more, do you have any keywords for me to search on?

Did Kerry, Gephardt, Edwards, and Lieberman have any clue how much they were being mislead?

The Weapons of Mass destruction thing always sort of stuck in my craw and I'm now beginning to see why. I'm glad we are freeing the Iraqi people, but I can see now why people are saying there were better ways.

Can you give me more information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Here is a documentary and book recs
Watch this Frontline documentary, which you can watch online:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/truth/view/

There is also a ton of ancillary interviews, etc. there.

I can't think of links off hand--but I recommend the new Suskind book, as well as Soros's The Bubble of American Supremacy. I especially recommend the latter, which is brief but very intelligent.

They are good books, and will give you some ideas--both from an insider, as well as a more "theoretic" perspective--on the danger America is in by a dishonest foreign policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Also, realize you are dealing with political junkies on here
Who know every article and argument inside and out. TV media is really crummy and doesn't give you a very good idea of what's going on in the debates.

For a TON of links, go to

http://atrios.blogspot.com

On the left side, you'll see a bunch of good resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. WATCH THIS SPEECH--by former NSC head
http://www.newamericanstrategies.org/downloads/

The specific link, for Zbigniew Brzezinski, is here:

mms://media.newamericanstrategies.org/newamericanstrategies/zbigniewbrzezinski_100.wmv
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. Show me the WMD please. The sarin, the botulism, the anything...
Where's all the stuff Powell told UN we knew about? Where's all the stuff W said in tjhe last SOTU saddam had? If it was true. you show it to me, cuz yoor guys got their way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eissa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #26
40. Regarding the botulism
You can find some in Katherine Harris' forehead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eissa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
31. No links, but
The Wilson affair. According to Joe Wilson (Vanity Fair magazine, either the November or December issue), Wilson was sent to Africa to investigate the Iraq-Niger-uranium connection. Came back and reported to CIA of no connection. CIA informs adminstration of this. Administration STILL uses the connection in the "president's" state of the union address to rally public support for a war that, according now to O'Neill, was in the making pre-9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukla Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
38. Thanks to all who have responded so far
I will be watching the documentary and getting back to this thread to respond. I appreciate this. I've been looking for this sort of thing for a while because I've had my suspicions. It may take a while.

A friend told me not to believe what I was seeing on CNN. They were right it would appear.

Does anybody have any keyword search suggestions or links to add?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Go to atrios.blogspot.com
And you'll get links to magazines, articles, books, etc.

Just poke around. Forget keywords; you'll bump into things randomly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. Here's Joe being a democrat. Behold:

http://www.laweekly.com/ink/03/34/news-ireland.php

(of course, his papers are in order so he can rag on Clark's political purity)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
returnable Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. Thanks for sharing
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatrickS Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
41. Moore voted for Nader in 2000
'Nuff said!

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. Apparently he learned his lesson. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turkw Donating Member (521 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #41
53. I believe that Moore initially endorsed Nader, but changed his mind and
supported Gore after Nader broke some promises not to campaign in swing states. Anyone have more information on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
44. Interesting how Moore has changed his strategy so much.....
since the 2000 election. I think it's a good sign when formerly vocal Nader supporters announce they're going to do anything to beat Bush. Let's hope others follow his lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_Dawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
46. Link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark4VotingRights Donating Member (795 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
47. Woah! When was this broadcast?! It's great. Thank you Bleachers7.
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellhathnofury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
48. I don't think Moore has any right to tell Lieberman to leave the party...
especially considering he's new to the party while Joe has been a vocal member for damn near 40 years.

For some reason I remember Joe making the same votes as Edwards, Gephardt, and Kerry. At least he sticks to his guts.

Screw Moore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toot Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. I agree.
I'm not a big fan of Lieberman, but if Moore cared so much about who is most likely to beat Bush he should have never supported Nader.

I like Moore, but I don't really care about his opinion since 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellhathnofury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Exactly, the Greens shouldn't get to co-opt the party and then
tell long time members that they don't belong in the party. This show's something about Moore's character. I was always a little suspicious about him, he sensationalizes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
51. NYT(Clark)"he's is actually slightly to the left of Dean."
The New York Times" pointed out last week, he's actually slightly to the left of Dean.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
52. great interview
i kind of feel the same way about lieberman. but i'd choose L over Dean. don't flame, just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George_Bonanza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
54. "Clark to the left of Dean" - Just reaffirms Clark as my number two
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC