Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The chances are one in a thousand that Bush can win a fair election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 09:47 PM
Original message
The chances are one in a thousand that Bush can win a fair election
The chances are one in a thousand that Bush can win a fair election.

Bush is at 46% in the national averages. The 50% Rule says he’s toast.



Kerry’s win probability is approaching 100% as his expected electoral vote total nears 340.



Kerry’s projected winning margin is more than three percentage points.



If Kerry gets 75% of the undecided vote, it’s a mini-landslide of over 330 electoral votes.



Kerry is surging in the states that count: the battleground



Kerry’s win probabilities in the battleground states approach 100% as he opens up 6-8% leads.



Kerry has pulled ahead the national independent poll group average.



The Bush media are calling it a dead heat. They’ll continue to do so AFTER Kerry wins the election.



Bush job approval is at 48.50%, not good for an incumbent



The more polls that are averaged in a group average, the smaller the margin of error.



The Monte Carlo method simulates 5000 election trials. So the probability of a Kerry win is just
the number of trial wins divided by 5000. Right now it’s at 99.9%.



EV simulation outcomes are normally distributed around Kerry’s mean (expected) electoral vote. .







Interested in the latest polling results? Want an introduction to the methodology?
Then go here.
http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
strategery blunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. WOO HOO!
Edited on Mon Nov-01-04 09:51 PM by chair094
I just checked out , and I know that it doesn't really have a consistent methodology, but it has gone from red to blue in 48 hours (probably because Zogby just released a slew of polls).

Kerry is surging, I can feel it in my bones:bounce::D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wysi Donating Member (475 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. I've been looking for your update tonight...
... and here you are with your dose of good vibes. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I posted the update earlier, but things move fast..
tia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kick
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nonsense statistics
It's still very close... we need every vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oddman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. what does that mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The statistics are massaged by judgments that are outside the data.
Edited on Mon Nov-01-04 11:33 PM by robcon
If you are going to use data, you have to be consistent. Set up an hypothesis, and support it, or declare that the data does not support it. Most polls are within the margin of error, so the hypothesis of either candidate winning is neither supported nor denied.

The statement about "approaching 100%" probability is the sign of someone who doesn't know what he/she is talking about... unless it's meant as some kind of rallying cry, rather than as a conclusion from the data.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC