Anybody who gets a statistical analysis

of exit polls versus Diebold machines, breakdown per precient and
what the error is of the exit polls versus other areas using
a "tracable" ballot and their exit polls....

i hope it's posted far and wide.

I just do not believe the exit poll error was this great...especially after 2000.

Or do a statistical analysis...

get the exit polls per precient and the raw vote per precient

and then map out the error per precient and highlight the diebold
areas.

If there is 0.1% error between the raw vote and exit polls
in all areas where diebold was not used..

and then see a > 4% error where Diebold was...or even a jump in error in battleground states where diebold was used...we're onto something and
they should confisgate the entire Diebold system, including the servers, sick the computer engineers onto the system and look to prove fraud.

This is the real issue, they've cooked the votes.

They need to get statisticians and engineers on this right now.

Supposedly Diebold has 1M lines of code (which is unbelievable)
and there are many ways to put down a trojan and have it self destruct...

they need to get the security experts on this immediately if it stinks.

I think intuitively it stinks but would need to run a real statistical
analysis to see for sure.

the original results may likely continue to exist on the disk drives as abandoned records. The FBI and CIA work with extracting this kind of ghost information from computers all the time.

If I were the DNC I would demand a validation and a recount for both FL and OH, since results don't match exit polls. The scope of Bush*Co's fraud truly appears to be mind-boggling.