Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Revenge on the Red States!!!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Cats Against Frist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 02:29 PM
Original message
Revenge on the Red States!!!!!
While you nilly-pillies are sitting around here crowing about uncounted ballots (sorry, just kidding -- I know it's serious, but I thought maybe that would get a chuckle), your beloved (am I?) Cats Against Frist has hatched a plan to take the country back.

You know how that map of donor v. recipient states was floating around, and we were all taking turns trashing on the knuckledraggers in the red states for scamming our tax dollars to pay for their shit, while they're crowing about "not taking welfare?"

Two other clues, I'll give you:

1. People around here keep saying that if we're going to turn this thing around on the crazies of the right, we have to get involved in local government, like they did.

2. The GOP wants to cut federal taxes.

Anyone putting 2+2 together, yet?

OK, I'll tell you -- or I'll hypothesized, since I'm a dream theorist, instead of super pragmatic, but maybe we can do something with this.

We have our blue state senators and representatives go hog wild on letting the GOP have any federal tax cuts that it wants.

Since we outnumber knuckledraggers in our blue states, we become very active in state government, and get our voters out to support increases in STATE income tax, which, since we control all local and state government, we can allocate however we want.

Now, we are donor states by quite a bit, and with the extra money staying within the state, and not flowing out to the Bible belt, we might be able to lower taxes on corporations and businesses, as INCENTIVE to get them to move there -- more jobs.

This would make up for the fact that even though the donor states are more populous with low-income people -- wait! The data shows that there are actually MORE poor people in the red states than the blue states, despite what sterotypes may assume.

So here's the grandmaster plan:

We move enough people out of blue states to "barely red states" like Ohio and push verrrrrrrrrrrryyyyyy hard -- all of us, for people to participate in local government. MOST of the best, high-income states are already blue ANYWAY, so we will hold most of the clout -- technology and resource-wise.* We help the red states abolish federal taxes -- (which their supporters are so happy to abolish the federal government, they'd support, even though it would screw them -- THANKS RUSH!!!!) -- shift the income to state taxes, with which we can make our societies a little bit better -- and damn it! get back the money that we're paying to those welfare red states for our own communities -- and then offer large tax breaks and incentives to businesses that will provide us with lots of jobs.

Sound like a plan?

*This solution actually gets AROUND the libertarian problem of de-centralization, perhaps concentrating wealth in the red states. I don't know why I didn't think of it.

Shoot holes in my theory, if you wish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Cats Against Frist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No, we wouldn't
My money is on this -- I think the odds are that the GOP is more manipulating the religious vote than it is serious about letting them go through with their Christian Reconstructionist plans -- for now. Eventually, the right will breed "super Christians," who will hold both the money reigns and the power -- but that's a few decades off.

My bet is that a large enough percentage of Republicans only vote GOP because of their wallet (the moderates) -- and that we could maybe get them on board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yay! I was just going to make a "plan thread"
i live in georgia, so i'm redder than red right now.


i sorta of like your idea, altho it screws me in the short-term, but we need to do something.


as far as religion goes, we've just got to keep treating it like a non-issue. trot out jefferson and the constitution every chance you get, if people want there second amendment rights they have to accept the entire set of founding priniciples. this ain't the bible, and you can't cherry pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cats Against Frist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Ms Tryska
hopefully you can re-locate. If you're willing to work hard in a blue state, I'm sure the Liberal Relocation Bureau will assist you with getting set up.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Liberal Relocation Bureau - LOL! This plan has merit, but I also think
that legislation should be passed so that a state can't take more money from the fed. treasury than it contributes - much quicker results.

I may need to consult the Bureau. We're talking about taking the break from school during Thanksgiving and visiting VT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cats Against Frist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. That wouldn't work
The GOP porkmeisters KNOW that they need blue state money to fund their military operations, as well as their hometown projects. It would be much easier to get them to go under restricting the power of taxation of the federal government.

I'll jump on the Posse Comitatus bandwagon, if you will!!!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah, but who the hell wants to move to a red state?
Edited on Wed Nov-03-04 02:43 PM by Straight Shooter
I'm in Oregon now for 13 years. I lived in Texas, Virginia, Tennessee, North Carolina. No effin' way would I move back there. Those people give me the shivering creeps!

Edit to clarify: the majority who voted for * over there

Sorry about that, my emotions are running ahead of my critical thinking this morning :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cats Against Frist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. You wouldn't have to move to a "RED" state
only a "barely red" state -- and there are only a few of them that we would need. We'd only have to go to a couple which are already donor states -- or close, like Florida and OH. I'm not talking about moving to Oklahoma here, kids.

And second -- you want to live under the rise of the right wing? I like the Pac NW too, but I'm in Iowa for a couple of years, and I haven't died, yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think we need to turn off the spigot to the red states.
Let them sink or swim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cats Against Frist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. It's a real proposition, I think
there are some kinks, but it might be able to be offset by some other solutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cats Against Frist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sorry to kick my own thread
but I'm going to believe there's something to this, until someone tells me that there is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vet_against_Bush Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. Bush will expand the debt but 7 trillion or so... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cats Against Frist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I believe this -- but tell me how this affects my plan
as long as we don't piss off the world, and they call in our debt or something -- we're still OK, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davhill Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. Come on down to Florida
We only need a few thousand more liberals to make us Blue again. Don't worry about those hurricanes, most of the time the weather is nice (a bit hot and muggy in the summer though)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenRob Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. hmmm.
I've been thinking about this too. California has been pretty much neglected under Bush for Federal tax money. I think it's time we close the bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. Actually
This is the first thing said today that has put a smile on my face.

Interesting plan...go with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cats Against Frist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. We'd need everyone's help, including you
I think it has possibilities. I keep wanting someone to see it that might get a better sense of if it would really work, or if someone could make the donor/recipient discrepancy work out better than I've thought about it.

Tell your friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I'll move
Get me out of this red hellhole called Alabama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEconomist Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. This plan uses the "Starve the Beast"
agenda to our advantage. Cut federal taxes to a bare minimum and make up the difference through state taxes. I like it!!! This way we deny welfare states (Red States) of our hard earned, liberal money. Fuck the redneck poor! Moreover, Blue States can provide their own welfare benefits and health care to their own. Fuck the X-ian poor! Hell, a good many corporate offices and headquarters are located in Blue States. We give them tax breaks to stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cats Against Frist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. That's what I'm talkin' about
And I realized -- if we take over the most populous states, then not only could we guarantee all of our senators are blue -- we might be able to control the house of reps, too.

That's it, exactly -- starve them. I would feel sorry for the people left in the states with the Christo-fascists, but they're probably many of the same assholes that didn't get out to vote against Bush, or voted against their best interest.

It's a theory.

So, if you're a blue person in a red state -- pack your bags and move to OH, FLA (which I'm pretty sure are donor states) -- or move to one of the very blue states, which would ensure a clean majority for our agenda.

Will this get me classified as an enemy of the state? I don't think we're breaking any laws. It's like the "free state" New Hampshire thing, yeah?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. "starve the beast" -- I like it!
Most blue-staters don't realize just how much they subsidize bushcountry. I mean, we've got states that send a buck to Washington, and get back a measly 60 cents of it, while the rest disappears into the gaping ungrateful maw of the Alabama peanut farmers, or the like. I think this has strong potential for popularity as a basic fairness issue in the donor states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. I like it. Put Colorado on your list. We're turning.
Some little known facts about our election here, overshadowed by the failure of our EC split, and a Bush win that was less than 2000...

We added a Dem to the Senate (Salazar), replacing a Repug (Nighthorse Turncoat)
We added a Dem to the House (John Salazar...yeah, his brother) to replace the Fruitcake (Remember him?).

But most important...WE TOOK BACK THE STATE LEGISLATURE! No more gerrymandering from us, and Bush-cronie Gov Owens' agenda of a right to work state is dead in it's tracks! Watch a Dem take the Governorship in 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayitAintSo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'm liking it .... I'm really liking it ....
I like your moniker too !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avenueb Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
23. who's going to move to ohio?
no thanks.. nor oklahoma, my state voted for Kerry, and the Dems took further control of the legislature. I'm not moving. I say split it into two countries, we can do a high speed train between cali and new york.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC