|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 09:41 PM Original message |
Poll question: Binary Gay Marriage Poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Jacobin (820 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
1. Where is the option "It's up to the states"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 09:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Isn't That A Cop Out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Jacobin (820 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 09:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 09:50 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. That's My Position... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RPM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 11:56 PM Response to Reply #3 |
29. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azure (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 09:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 11:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. Just like interracial marriage should be, right? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azure (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 11:46 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Red Herring. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 11:58 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. Just because it has not been banned for the last few years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seaj11 (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 09:45 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 11:53 PM Response to Reply #2 |
28. You've unfortunately bought the fundie misinterpretation of the issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyr330 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
4. YES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azure (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 11:52 PM Response to Reply #4 |
27. They don't want basic human rights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cats Against Frist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
6. I support civil unions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BamaLefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 09:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. If we want to win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
socalover (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 09:52 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I agree, we cannot win with this issue! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike L (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 11:03 PM Response to Reply #9 |
18. correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyr330 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 12:42 AM Response to Reply #9 |
40. I hope you're not saying what I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSdemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
8. Other: Ban government recognition of marriage. Civil Unions for all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elsiesummers (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 11:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. This could work on a grass roots level. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike L (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
12. No. It will get us nothing but losses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy_Stephenson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 11:56 PM Response to Reply #12 |
30. My my aren't you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike L (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 12:07 AM Response to Reply #30 |
36. I wouldn't compare race and sexual orientation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CityHall (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
13. No - should oppose bans, otherwise treat it like flag burning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
14. Gays should be able to mary. F* the dem platform and everything else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azure (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 11:58 PM Response to Reply #14 |
34. That's the wrong attitude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
socalover (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
15. I agree with civil unions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bread and Circus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
16. No, it's just something Dem pols should pay lip service to when... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy_Stephenson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 11:57 PM Response to Reply #16 |
31. See post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
17. People should have the choice whether they want to marry or not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrishBloodEngHeart (815 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 11:06 PM Response to Original message |
19. the word marriage has a religous connetation to most Americans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
20. Marriages are for the church. Civil unions are for the government. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gottaB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
21. Yes, but under the umbrella of freedom to marry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elsiesummers (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 11:33 PM Response to Original message |
23. Not in the platform. Democrats should increase gay rights incrementally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oxymoron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 11:58 PM Response to Reply #23 |
33. Rapid Change? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike L (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 01:49 AM Response to Reply #33 |
43. Oxy, you saw gay rights go from, "don't ask, don't tell," to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-04 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
26. Yes. It should. The idea isn't to have the popular position every time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texas is the reason (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 12:04 AM Response to Original message |
35. no. it is time to win an election for once. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enki23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
37. it wasn't in our platform THIS TIME |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pk_du (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 12:27 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Amen ( Mister or Sister) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
38. I am vehemently opposed to the terminology "gay marriage" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill McBlueState (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 12:50 AM Response to Reply #38 |
42. I'm also opposed to that term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clovis Sangrail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
41. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC