|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
11 Bravo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 09:53 PM Original message |
So what do we abandon to "reframe the debate"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio-Active (735 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. we don't abandon anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azure (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 10:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Exactly. We don't "abandon" anything... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
2. Nothing. It's NOT ABOUT THE ISSUES. It's about branding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
3. Reframing the debate isn't necessarily about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
5. Abandon nothing! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
6. Did you get the clue that we don't have to "abandon" anything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 10:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Wow, me and my "empty rhetoric" are suitably chastened. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 10:33 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Once again, did you notice that NO ONE said you should abandon anything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
7. reframing the debate does not mean jettisoning the issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
8. frankly, I think we should veer sharp LEFT.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 10:31 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Reframing the debate says nothing whatsoever about moving left or right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
9. Was that a "hit and run"??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
union_maid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
10. Not a thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 10:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. You're Karl Rove's wet dream |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cally (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
13. Reframe the debate..yes. Abandon issues..no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnnyCougar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
16. Nothing. We don't have to. We just have to define our message better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trahurn (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
17. I Can't Believe Some Of You |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 10:45 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. You clearly don't understand what framing is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 10:48 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. WHO THE FUCK SUGGESTED FORSAKING OUR BELIEFS AND VALUES?????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 11:00 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Grab a dictionary, and look up up "rhetorical question". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RafterMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 11:16 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Actually, NOBODY suggested that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntPatsy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
20. We don't back down, we stay on course and we stick to the message |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RafterMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 11:17 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. "Stay on course".... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catbert836 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-05-04 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
23. We don't ABANDON anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC