Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Any Montanans in the hizzouse?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 11:56 AM
Original message
Any Montanans in the hizzouse?
I hear your state legislature went Dem for the first time in a decade and you elected your first Dem governor since 1989. How did that happen? How come your fellow Montanans also voted for Bush? (Not that it would have made THAT much difference if it had gone the other way, but we in the East tend to view the high plains as pretty solidly Republican.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Legislature gains owe a lot to redistricting
And the Governor owes a lot to the extreme unpopularity of the outgoing Republican governor, plus he had a lot of name recognition from previous statewide office runs.
Montana's "conservatism", like many western states, lies not in religious fundamentalism but in libertarian resentment of "elite" national politicians and policies. If you can make a case of some big bad governmental entity trying to tell Montanans or their businesses what to do then you'll win every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. seems like we can win them over more than some in the south
since it's not so much based on religion. many of the religious fanatics automatically reject certain candidates based on differences on religion, or things like gay rights or abortion.

but if it's based more on specific things such as policy and how people want to live then it's something we can work with. even on gay rights which they might have a problem with at first , we may be able to make a case for while they should support it no matter personal belief. the religious ones would just reject it outright based on the belief that it's a sin and they would go to hell for supporting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. "Outsider" policy wonks fail miserably
even if they're telling the truth. You have to be "one of us," you have to be down-to-earth.
A national effort to get Montana will fail miserably. What MIGHT work is resources and seed money to build local organizations and networks to get out the Democratic Party message and values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. How much does Montana extract from the tax meccas back east?
New Jersey, for instance, gets back 57 cents for every dollar it gives to the federal government. What is Montana's ratio of dollars out to dollars in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't know
but I would suspect that we get back more than we put in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YNGW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Zell Miller is a Democrat....
.... but he's not a liberal. My own Gov. of NC is a Democrat, but overall he's not that liberal. My guess is you'd find that many of these Democrats in Montana are more conservative than some Republicans in the Northeast. Being from the South, I can tell you that many Democrats who hold office on the local level are not very liberal.

Your question might be better framed with those factors in mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. As an exiled Montanan I think you're wrong there
I think the Democrats in Montana are quite liberal. Missoula is a smaller Seattle. Montana was a Democratic stronghold for many, many years - as a labor state that relied on mining and timber industry. There are many environmentalists, outdoors types, hippies, hipsters. Don't stereotype Montana because it can't be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC