Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohio Democratic Party: "Every Vote Will Be Counted!"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 04:42 PM
Original message
Ohio Democratic Party: "Every Vote Will Be Counted!"
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/111004V.shtml

Every Vote Will Be Counted!
Dan Trevas, Ohio Democratic Party Communications Director
t r u t h o u t | Statement

Tuesday 09 November 2004

The Ohio Democratic Party shares Sen. John Kerry's insistence that every vote be counted.

Here is where we stand in Ohio:

After the Unofficial Results reported Nov. 2 - George Bush leads John Kerry by 136,483 votes.

Provisional ballots will be counted.

155,000 provisional ballots have been cast and not yet been counted.

County Boards of Elections have until Friday to verify the eligibility of those who cast a provisional vote. Counting will begin, Saturday, November 13. County Boards have until Dec. 1, 2004 to certify their vote totals and report them to the Secretary of State.

Two Democrats and two Republicans sit on each County Board of Elections.

Tabulations of the votes will be done in a bi-partisan manner. Only if there is a tie vote on the board does the decision go to the Secretary of State.

Overseas absentee ballots have not been counted.

Overseas Absentee ballots by civilians may have been received by County Boards of Elections by Nov. 2 that have not yet been counted. The Boards of Elections will count those votes.

Overseas absentee ballots by military have until, Friday, Nov. 12 to arrive and be counted by the Boards of Elections in the final total.

93,000 punch cards were cast, but a vote for president was not counted.

The votes were not counted either because the voter voted for more than one candidate or did not vote for a presidential candidate. These ballots will be reexamined if there is a recount.

Ohio has a uniform, statewide system for recounting punch card ballots. Hanging chads and dimpled chads are treated uniformly throughout the state.

Examination for errors going on in all 88 Ohio counties.

A Vote Error on Election night gave George Bush 3,893 more votes in a Franklin County precinct than actually cast for him. That error was found by comparing the unofficial abstract of votes casts by precinct to votes for each candidate. Officials in all 88 counties have been contacted and requested to review for a similar error.

No Ohio County used Diebold Electronic Voting Machines.

Ohio did not use modern electronic voting machines in this election. Six counties use an older form of electronic voting, which has a means of verifying the accuracy of the vote. In 69 Ohio Counties, punch card ballots were used.

Recount

In Ohio a recount is automatic for statewide election if difference in the vote is within 0.25% of the total votes cast.

For a recount is the presidential race, this is probably about a 19,000-vote margin between Kerry and Bush.

Only a losing candidate can request a recount. A recount may always be requested regardless of the closeness of the race. The recount is requested by the losing candidate. The request for a recount must be made within 5 days of the official announcement of the results by the Secretary of State.

The fee for a recount is set by each Board of Elections and may be between $5 and $10 per precinct. You can limit the recount to specific precincts. The cost is deposited by the person making the recount request at the time of the application based on the number of precincts requested to be recounted. The entire recount and contest procedures are outlined at ORC 3515.

Vote Fraud or Mistakes

Information about fraud or mistake can be reported the Ohio Democratic Party.

You can leave a message at (614) 221-6563 ext. 134 or email dan@ohiodems.org. This information will be share with our legal counsel as the official election tabulations are being made.

You may also share any concerns about voter fraud or mistakes the Secretary of State by emailing: election@sos.state.oh.us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. YES. Amen to that--every vote must be counted!
Is that so hard in a effing DEMOCRACY?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. 93,000 undervotes
and we know from history they are mostly Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
34. Yeah, but they aren't just undervotes
"The votes were not counted either because the voter voted for more than one candidate or did not vote for a presidential candidate. These ballots will be reexamined if there is a recount."

Those are overvotes, undervotes and intentional non-votes, which happens more often than people realize, even for president.

The overvotes are gone. I doubt Ohio has a provision for attributing overvotes, punch cards in which two or more candidates were chosen. Non-votes will not have a mark or chad, and ignored. Kerry may be able to gain several thousand net votes among undervotes that do have evidence of an attempted vote (dimples, chads), but with only 93,000 total in the three categories, I wouldn't expect more than + 5000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. So 93,000 spoiled punchcards will be
re-examined "only if there is a recount." Those 93,000 ballots should be reason enough for a recount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. The losing candidate can request a recount.
Kerry is a losing candidate-why doesn't he request a recount?
The laws in OH seem to be much clearer than those in Florida!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Love Bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Maybe this is why Kerry hasn't requested a recount:
The request for a recount must be made within 5 days of the official announcement of the results by the Secretary of State.

Maybe I missed something, but the official announcement by the SoS can't be made until all of the provisional and absentee ballots have been tallied, right? So it's premature for Kerry (or anyone else) to request a recount. Maybe by the time that announcement is made enough discrepancies will be out there that Kerry might change his mind and ask for a recount. Who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yes. That is part of it. There is a challenge phase and a recount
phase. Gore screwed himself up by prolonging the challenge phase and it helped to run the clock out on him during the recount phase.
Bush/Cheney/Baker helped do that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. Gore was screwed in Florida
1) Opponent's brother, working with brother's campaign co-chairperson, disqualified tens of thousands of voters without any evidence whatsoever

2) Republican operatives forcibly shut down the recount in Miami-Dade County

3) bu$h's campaign co-chairperson refused to accept recount results favoring Gore because they were handed in 2 hours after her arbitrary deadline

4) Judge N. Sanders Sauls (who was later forced to decline an invitation by FreakRepublicans that he had previously accepted to attend a cozy get-together in South Carolina) wasted valuable time by demanding that the Democrats ship him thousands of controversial ballots by truck, only to refuse to look at them after they arrived.

5) Florida Supreme Court issued ruling mandating that all ballots be recounted, but

6) Cheney's hunting buddy on the US Supreme Court, Antonin Scalia, (who owed his job to the plaintiff's father) then suddenly decided that the court should, indeed, get involved in the process, and, lo and behold, the USSC overturned the Florida court's decision without any factual basis in the Constitution.

So, no matter what Gore had done, he would have been screwed over five ways to Sunday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohioan Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. It would be foolish for Kerry to demand a recount before the count is done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. Just to make sure, those five days are *after* and not before the sos
official announcement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohioan Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #31
36. Yes n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. NM threw away 10,000 of 13,000 provisional ballots
I hope that doesn't happen in OH.

Deliberate, targeted vote spoilage was used on a massive scale in this state IMHO.

19K is reasonable if the vote counting is non-partisan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Another "Unfiltered" fan...
A :toast: to a great unsername!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Unfiltered is now almost tied with Randi
as my fave AAR show. I can't get enough of Lizz and Rachel.

Thanks, when I saw Skinner's name change amnesty thread I thought it was a no brainer! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lil-petunia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. In some cases 5-10 times, if it is in the GOP column.
That's the real answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. If is suddenly tightens in Ohio
due to provisional and other ballots, I think Kerry should say, "George, not so fast on that inaugural speech."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitSileya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. But did they use central tabulators?
No Ohio County used Diebold Electronic Voting Machines.

Ohio did not use modern electronic voting machines in this election. Six counties use an older form of electronic voting, which has a means of verifying the accuracy of the vote. In 69 Ohio Counties, punch card ballots were used.


It's not only the voting machines at the polling places, the danger is even more present if they're using the GEMS central tabulators. That's what Ms. Harris has been fighting against.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. According to this Diebold list:
http://www.why-war.com/features/diebold-campaign.pdf

...Franklin County OH used the machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitSileya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Why am I not surprised?
As Ms. Harris told Governor Dean, it's much easier changing the results of 400 voting machines after their result has been fed into the central tabulator, rather than changing 400 results on 400 machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitSileya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. And to add,
it isn't just Diebold machines we must be on the lookout for - isn't the CEO of one of the other voting machine companies the brother of the vice president of Diebold?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
59millionmorons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. William Pitt
What are your thoughts on this whole fraud issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. My thoughts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohioan Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. That's an old list - dated February 2003
As of July 2004, only three counties - Lorain, Trumbull and Hardin - were planning to use Diebold machines (all other counties had decided to stick with punch card and optical scan in light of new state legislation requiring voter-verified paper receipts by 2006). However, in mid-July Ken Blackwell barred the use of the Diebold machines in these three counties because of security flaws.

Diebold machines were not used anywhere in Ohio.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. Franklin decided to go with another providor
And so did Summit county, they bought diebold before they bought someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. What about the 90,000 more votes than voters in 30 counties??? n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. And that is WITHOUT
the provisionals and overseas and military absentee votes. Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. I think you might be confused.
I think there were 90,000 more votes than voters in 30 precincts in Cuyahoga county as opposed to more votes than voters in 30 counties.

I could be wrong, but this item has been confused a lot lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. Well shit is this gonna happen or not?
That's what the letter doesn't say. And we have a limited amount of time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RinaJ Donating Member (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
18. Pretty much as I suspected
Thanks for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. Does Ohio law say what to do with overvotes?
Like the precinct with 4,000 more votes than registered voters? Does the whole precinct get thrown out? Do they count it anyway, knowing it is wrong? Aren't there a ton of places in Ohio with overvotes?

(I'm not sure of the term, in Florida in 2000 we called an "overvote" a ballot voting for 2 people in the same race. Remember they threw out the ballots of people voting for Gore and writing his name in on the same ballot.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohioan Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Ohio uses the "intent of the voter" standard in recounts
An overvote occurs where it appears that the voter picked more than one candidate in the same race, such as in the example you gave. Such ballots are considered "spoiled" and are not counted in the regular count. However, should a recount occur, they are included in the hand recount and, if the intent of the voter is clear, they are counted.

The example you gave of too many people voting is not an overvote situation. In such instances where the result seems to be a clear anomaly, the local board of elections will try to correct the problem before certifying its count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. Let's just hope...
there is truckloads of attorneys watching every move from our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
23. I have a wild theory about Kerry's recent statements to throw-out.
Kerry is "fired-up" because he knows that the check is in the mail with this fraud business. He mentions running again in four years perhaps because he suspect that the provisionals and recount ballots (undervotes) will put him barely over the top, and that he'd be running for re-election then..

Wild theory. I don't believe it, but still, pause for thought..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
For PaisAn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
24. Have people from DU sent the Ohio Democratic Party
all our info on fraud and mistakes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
27. Yes but will fake votes be UN-COUNTED. That ... is the question.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
umtalal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
33. I think Senator Kerry wants to run again in 2008.
You better believe he wants to show some spine.

Having said that, I have not read the whole article. So I might eat my words ten minutes from now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
37. There is no excuse
not to count all the votes in a supposed Democracy. That's the least that can be done, regardless of whether Kerry has conceded or not.

It's a matter of public record. We as a nation must have an accurate vote count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kuozzman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 06:05 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Have you guys seen the "Gingrich Doctrine"? WTF
He sounds like some evil dictator taking over countries. Oh, wait.
Helping America Vote Act:
January 1, 2006-Deadline for States to implement computerized Statewide voter registration database if qualified for waiver.

January 1, 2006-All punchcard and lever machines replaced in States accepting Section 102 payments who qualified for a waiver of the original deadline.

http://www.fec.gov/hava/hava.htm
http://www.law.cornell.edu/background/HAVA.html

Newt:
The 2004 election made American conservatism the majority viewpoint in the United States, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Monday.

He goes on to say the re-election of George W. Bush the fourth stage in the political life of majority U.S. conservatism. The first, he said, was 1980's election of Ronald Reagan, followed by 1994's “Contract with America” and the election of George W. Bush in 2000.

“Bush's 2004 re-election, which also increased the GOP's majority in the U.S. House and Senate, marks the beginning of a sustained Republican majority in that it resembles the 1936 election that saw Franklin Delano Roosevelt winning a second term while bringing new Democrats into the U.S. House and Senate.”

http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20041108-124616-9353r.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC