Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did The Clinton Team DOOM The Kerry Campaign?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 01:51 PM
Original message
Did The Clinton Team DOOM The Kerry Campaign?
By Arianna Huffington

November 11, 2004

Twelve days before the election, James Carville stood in a Beverly Hills living room surrounded by two generations of Hollywood stars. After being introduced by Sen. John Kerry’s daughter, Alexandra, he told the room — confidently, almost cockily — that the election was in the bag.

“If we can’t win this damn election,” the advisor to the Kerry campaign said, “with a Democratic Party more unified than ever before, with us having raised as much money as the Republicans, with 55% of the country believing we’re heading in the wrong direction, with our candidate having won all three debates, and with our side being more passionate about the outcome than theirs — if we can’t win this one, then we can’t win shit! And we need to completely rethink the Democratic Party.”

Well, as it turns out, that’s exactly what should be done. But instead, Carville and his fellow architects of the Democratic defeat have spent the last week defending their campaign strategy, culminating on Monday morning with a breakfast for an elite core of Washington reporters.

At the breakfast, Carville, together with chief campaign strategist Bob Shrum and pollster Stan Greenberg, seemed intent on one thing — salvaging their reputations.

They blamed the public for not responding to John Kerry’s message on the economy, and they blamed the news media for distracting voters from this critical message with headlines from that pesky war in Iraq. “News events were driving this,” said Shrum. “The economy was not driving the news coverage.”

But shouldn’t it have been obvious that Iraq and the war on terror were the real story of this campaign? Only these Washington insiders, stuck in an anachronistic 1990s mind-set and re-fighting the ’92 election, could think that the economy would be the driving factor in a post-9/11 world with Iraq in flames. That the campaign’s leadership failed to recognize that it was no longer “the economy, stupid,” was the tragic flaw of the race.

In conversations with Kerry insiders over the last nine months, I’ve heard a recurring theme: that it was Shrum and the Clintonistas (including Greenberg, Carville and senior advisor Joe Lockhart) who dominated the campaign in the last two months and who were convinced that this election was going to be won on domestic issues, like jobs and healthcare, and not on national security.

More... http://ariannaonline.com/columns/column.php?id=744
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ducks In A Row Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. We need to email her
"No honey. It was the machines. It was the harrassment that kept people from voting. It was purging people from the rolls. It was stolen. That's all there was to it"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But that's not all there was to it.
Take off the blinders. Sure there was fraud. Probably even a significant amount of fraud. But there does not appear to have been enough fraud to have tipped the election. I've run the numbers six ways til Sunday. Correcting for fraud doesn't put us over the top.

We have to count the votes. Sure. But there are systemic Democratic problems we need to address. And by not admitting it, you're part of the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Well, stupid me!
You tell me, what numbers did you run?
Are you serious-you run the numbers and there is not enough fraud to put us over the top?
LOL.
Where exactly did you get your FRAUD numbers?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reality Not Tin Foil Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Thank you for stating the obvious!!
These conspiracy theories are more than just irritating and embarrassing...They're self-fulfilling prophecies, imo. They create a Boogie Man who can't be defeated. The Boogie Man NEVER dies, afterall.

There is nothing wrong with keeping the criminals honest, but we need to focus on solid tangible reasons why we didn't win and work to correct those mistakes. This country is NOT 51% Puke!

The Kerry campaign is on the front lines here and they're not running out in the streets shreiking like maniacs...Personally, I'm with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shrub chipper Donating Member (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I share your sentiments,
"Reality, not tin foil" is my motto, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reality Not Tin Foil Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. As many as three people can keep a secret...
...as long as two of them are dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Secret Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. She's Looking for any Excuse other than Fraud. L.O.L.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
shrub chipper Donating Member (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Ridiculous
Edited on Fri Nov-12-04 03:14 PM by shrub chipper
I hope your next posts are more based in reality rather than on RW talking Points.

BTW, welcome to DU for a little while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopTheMorans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. horseshit, plain and simple
they want whats best for the country; what's best for them comes second. there's no way that either bill or hillary would try to ensure another 4 years of bush so that hillary could run in 08. break out your :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Yeah. Gore ignored Clinton. Clark didn't get the nomination. And only at..
Edited on Fri Nov-12-04 03:32 PM by AP
...the very end of Kerry's campaign did Kerry take advice from Carville, Lockhart and Clinton.

Yeah. That's quite a grip on power Clinton has. Most of the time, everyone ignores him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nonsense. Carville is not responsible for losing this election. I would
like us all to try to resist this barage of articles trying to blame some of our best Democrats for the work of Rove and the Republican Machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. I've read three or four accounts of this Shrum-Greenberg-Carville talk
Edited on Fri Nov-12-04 03:33 PM by AP
and this is the first one that has said that all three were trying to salvage their reputations. The others all said that Shrum was unwilling to blame campaign strategy while Greenberg and Carville were willing to criticize strategy.

Also, it's not clear what Arianna is complaining about. Obviously if the Democrats are week on national security and strong on domestic issues, their job is to try to make themselves not appear week on national security issues and to make voters think that domestic issues are more important. That's exactly what Kerry did. The last ten days of the campaign, the media only talked about missing explosives and the OBL tape. Could that have hurt Democrats less? Well, maybe if they did a better job of convincing voters that jobs, class and middle class opportunity were more important (which might have been easier if the head of the ticket wasn't a wealthy New Englander who went to Yale, but whatever).

What did Arianna want them to do? Abandon domestic issues totally and completely run a campaign focused entirely on the war? Why would any Democrat vote for a Democrat who tells them that the ONLY issue is the war? I don't believe the only issue is the war. I believe the war is part of a strategy by Republicans to transfer a ton of wealth to the wealthy. It's part of a biggger picture. If I thought the only issue were war, I'd just be a Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. the blood of EVERY soldier is on YOUR HANDS BITCH
come.get.me.

you fascist pig
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. It's already tombstoned.
What a LOSER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopTheMorans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. that's it, just a little more kool-aid, there you go
crawl back into your cave and hop on your satellite phone; tell the militia to get ready. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
15. No. The Bush team did....they STOLE it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC