Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush camp planning to Nuke US to hide Election Fraud

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:12 PM
Original message
Bush camp planning to Nuke US to hide Election Fraud
Read between the lines; they're not going to go down easy...

"FORMER HEAD OF CIA'S OSAMA BIN LADEN UNIT SAYS THE QAEDA LEADER HAS SECURED RELIGIOUS APPROVAL TO USE A NUCLEAR BOMB AGAINST AMERICANS
Fri Nov 12 2004 12:02:34 ET

Osama bin Laden now has religious approval to use a nuclear device against Americans, says the former head of the CIA unit charged with tracking down the Saudi terrorist. The former agent, Michael Scheuer, speaks to Steve Kroft in his first television interview without disguise to be broadcast on 60 MINUTES Sunday, Nov. 14 (7:00-8:00 PM, ET/PT) on the CBS Television Network."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think if he does he will destroy Massachusetts.

And all the holy rollers will say it's because god finds Massachusetts to be so immoral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComplimentarySwine Donating Member (351 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't know...
Didn't Osama say he was going to go after the states that voted for Bush? Or was that just something that someone made up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Osama used the word 'states'
But from what I read, from the original text, it is more like "groups of persons" or "countries", not 'states' in the way that we think of them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenRob Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. You'll know...
who planted the bomb based on where it goes off. Osama Bin Laden is probably fully aware of which cities share the viewpoint of the Bush Administration, and which ones don't. As is Mr. Bush aware of the same.

San Francisco is my bet. It's a shame I live there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Bingo
Jeb called you all an "endangered species"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think it'd be somewhere in the west
so the prevailing winds could carry the fallout to as many people as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. I agree
Didn't Osama (or his second) mention in some previous tape about black winds of death, or something to that effect? Two possibilities would be either somewhere in the Midwest (and I'm talking the Illinois or Ohio area, not the plains states) where prevailing winds would carry to the heavily populated Eastern seaboard, or somewhere on the West coast . Those winds, however, carry over sparsely populated areas to the east, so I think the latter possibility is less likely.

Still, it's one thing to get a religious okay to use a bomb, it's another entirely to actually HAVE a bomb, somehow smuggle it into the country and then set it off. Personally, I think such a scenario is remote -- I hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Ohio makes sense, no possible way to recount what there actually
is to recount. Covers up alot of issues that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Tace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You Are A Fucking Bad Joke -- Stew In Your Own Shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democratreformed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Which world would that be in?
You know, according to your esteemed leader, there are several.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democratreformed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Ah! Attempted terrorism at its finest... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. What's The Matter, You Cowardly Schmuck?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Ummm..
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoleil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Election theft - Approved!
Fascism - Approved!
Bigotry - Approved!
Religious Intolerance - Approved!

It's a landslide!

Just keep the scoring accurate, okay Adolf? Oh. Not the Republican way, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winamericaback Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Ugh
I was going to reply and the moderator removed the message WAHHH

Oh well. I do know though that not all Republicans are like this.
Some of them do have a modicom of tact and some basic brain capacity.

Once you start denegrating people to prove your point then you have lost before you started.

Just a message to you if you do wander back in here:

I'm glad Bush won, I'm going to enjoy 4 years of him taking this country down the toilet. His win is going to make it simplistically easy for Democrats to win in 06 and especially in 08 :)

Until then, enjoy your JesusLand while you can although no TRUE Christian would ever dare to use the words that you did. Blasphemer!!

Go back to your hole from whence you came, your faulty logic and ineptitude are not wanted here.

Have a lovely day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rniel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. RELIGIOUS APPROVAL
So you mean Pat Robertson said it was ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shuffnew Donating Member (306 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Approval? Seems normal... Maybe Funded?
Edited on Fri Nov-12-04 04:32 PM by shuffnew
Reigious? NOT! Maybe we should tune in and see who the so-called "Christians (NOT!) -- Religious Right" is financially supporting now?

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Pat Robertson used his tax-exempt broadcast license to hold a fundraising telethon in the United States for the Guatemalan military and the Nicaraguan contras. On "The 700 Club," Robertson has interviewed Adolfo Calero and Steadman Fagoth, contra leaders; Efrain Rios Montt, then-president of Guatemala known for massive human rights abuses; Jeremias Chitunda, an Angolan guerrilla leader. One of his campaign pledges during his brief run for the presidency was to withdraw diplomatic recognition from Nicaragua and recognize the contras as a "government in exile." Robertson also interviewed a former president of El Salvador, Alvaro Magana, and individuals connected with the Salvadoran death squads. He praised death squad leader Roberto D'Aubuisson of the ARENA party as a "very nice fellow."
www.peopleunitedforreligiousfreedom.org/cbn_tangled_web...

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The U.S. operation of Pat Robertson's Christian Broadcasting Network was considered one of the top private funders of the contras.
http://www.peopleunitedforreligiousfreedom.org/cbn_tang...

A refugee worker said that in 1985, a CBN film team came to a World Relief refugee camp asking for gasoline. "I told them I would give them the fuel, but not if their vehicle belonged to the contras. They said it didn't. But when they came back a few days later, they admitted they had lied. The jeep belonged to Misura . CBN went down to do a story on freedom fighters.
They weren't interested in refugees."
http://www.peopleunitedforreligiousfreedom.org/cbn_tang...

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

"Efrain Rios Montt has been supported by Pat Robertson (Christian Broadcasting Network), Jerry Falwell (Moral Majority, Thomas Road Baptist Church, Liberty Federation), and Loren Cunningham (Youth with a Mission). . .Jimmy Swaggart Ministries has provided financial support for the schools of El Verbo in Guatemala. This is done under the "Programa Ayuda Infantile," a branch of the Swaggart ministry."
http://www.franz-lee.org/files/pandemonium00490.html
(It has also been said that Efrain Rios Montt is responisble for the deaths of about 70,000 Mayan peasants and political dissidents.
http://www.moreorless.au.com/killers/montt.htm )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shuffnew Donating Member (306 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. Fallujah wasn't enough, huh? Going for another approach?
Edited on Fri Nov-12-04 04:02 PM by shuffnew
And wonder why they bann any truth and why many appear to be jumping ship?

CIA Critic of U.S. War on Terror Resigns

By Tabassum Zakaria
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A CIA analyst who wrote a book that criticized the U.S. war on terror has resigned from the spy agency after it effectively banned him from publicly discussing his views, his publicist said on Thursday.


http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/news/story.jsp?floc=NW_1-T&oldflok=FF-RTO-PLS&idq=/ff/story/0002/20041111/1759464359.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. Warren Co., first to go....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George W. Dunce Donating Member (389 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. Well I guess were safe up here in Mass
They must be heading for one of the Red states. Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. More fear-mongering - What happened to the nuking of the Twin Cities
This poster also claimed that he had heard from his "trusted sources" that the Twin Cities would be nuked sometime around the last weekend in October.

This latest fear-mongering doesn't have a link, just like the last bit of malarky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
23. I think your tinfoil hat is on way too tight. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobo Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
24. Aww man why did you delete him....
I wanted to have fun with that moran.


Hey troll you wanna piece of me. Come on, I'll be waiting, coward.

Hobo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC