Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Al Sharpton would be president - elect right now.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JPJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 12:24 PM
Original message
Al Sharpton would be president - elect right now.
He's the only candidate who really spoke the truth about George Bush. He's the only candidate who could have sharpened the contrast between the candidates. The red staters would have listened to the Reverand, because he is a religious man. Additionally, he demonstrated strong fundraising support from Republicans in the primaries, showing his broad appeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SaintAnne Donating Member (272 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. funny
and he's wicked funny too! if he ran, he might get my vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. He could have won all three debates with his hands tied
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Practically anyone could have won all 3 debates against Bush.
Sharpton would have set off Bush in a major way, it would have been great to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Anybody but Kerry, evidently
...otherwise "liberal minded" people at work actually perceived that while Kerry "won" the first debate, they thought that Bush had taken the other two.
Of course I asked "WTF were you watching?"

Upshot: Kerry blew it, he should have gone in for the kill. We KNEW the debates were the only venue where the democratic points would be given air time. And he held back for fear of looking "mean". Although he did indeed look "mean" when he called a lesbian a lesbian. Why the hell did he do that? That was another reason cited as a plus for Bush. People at work thought that was uncalled for. When I told them it was no secret that she was gay, they rounded on my rightfully by saying that it was a surprise to THEM. They feel Kerry "outed" an innocent individual. Left many with a bad opinion of Kerry. He blew two of his scheduled 15 minutes, and it's obvious that that's all that he was going to get

Kerry's performances in the last two debates were constipated. Bush was able to give the illusion of winning because he wasn't obviously put in his place and exposed as the simpleton he is and was in the first debate. Was Kerry told to back off? What happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. If Bush does what Herbert Hoover did and then some more....
Al Sharpton will win 60% of the vote in 2008!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Al Sharpton couldn't get elected to dogcatcher in Brooklyn
And he's still running from the slander judgment Steven Pagonas got against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. He would probably get dog catcher.
Edited on Sat Nov-20-04 12:45 PM by gordianot
If nothing else a debate would have been wonderful entertainment. The man can deliver a speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. In his speech at Dem convention he said something the Dems should have
used in their election campaign. I thought it was a very important but I never heard it mentioned again...The Republicans were constantly telling African Americans that the Democrats took them for granted....What the Dems should have answered with was Sharpton's words from his convention speech..."We didn't come this far playing political games. It was those that earned our vote that got our vote. We got the Civil Rights Act under a Democrat. We got the Voting Rights Act under a Democrat. We got the right to organize under Democrats."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. He sure as hell woudln't have gotten the Jewish vote,or mine. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. it's an insignificant number anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. An insignificant number? So does that make Jews insignificant?
Good Lord.am I reading this on DU?

Al Sharpton is a racist troublemaker and was a joke candidate to anyone with a brain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I thought he was wonderful
as did my Jewish husband who would have voted for him happily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. LOL

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joelogan Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. in 2008, please please PLEASE
in 2008, vote for who you WANT to win, not for who you think has the best chance of winning!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. Love Al's rhetoric. Not a chance in hell he'd win a national election. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. Locking
copycat threads are for the Lounge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC