Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm glad that I'm no Democrat.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:01 AM
Original message
I'm glad that I'm no Democrat.
This party is ineffective at best. I believe that all Dems who are progressives should drop out and join the Green Party. For those that do not know what principles the Green Pary stands for go to their site and read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PittLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's effective... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Effectively marginalized
Power in numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PittLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Riiight ... I hope you got my sarcasm.
I'm not trying to be be rude to so called "defectors". Merely sarcastic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Oh sure. Just doing a piggyback "me, too"
Shoulda replied to the original, since that's who I was aiming at.

Hey! (shakes finger) go to bed.

Damn, I've got to figure out a way to get to bed at a decent hour, too. I can't keep this up for 4 more years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. What are the effective triumphs of your party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Grass roots growing.
Check out all of the local and state positions Greens now hold.

The Green Party is growing fast. If the Dems that are fed up with the
Moderate and Conservative Dems joined the Green Party it wouldn't be long before Natl. positions could be garnered. The Dems have been moving to the center for years ans now want to move even further to the the right.
This will gain them nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Conservative and Moderate Dems join the Greens?
Edited on Sun Nov-21-04 05:56 AM by fujiyama
WTF are you talking about?

No the GP will not replace the Democratic Party, and if they do the country will be even more screwed because the republicans will gain more than 60 senate seats. We will literally have permanent one party rule.

The Green Party does OK on a local level in a select few places (college towns and some cities). That means nothing though on the national level.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
talk hard Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. The Green Party is shrinking.
Dude, people like you've been saying that for years. And then you put Nader up as your candidate in 2000. He couldn't even qualify for matching funding and only got 2.5% of the vote. This year, your party was even less effective.

Here's the deal. You need to start at the grassroots of government, in the communities, the cities, and then the states. If you keep throwing candidates at the presidency, you will continue to marginalize your party with defeat after defeat.

What would be effective, however, is working WITHIN the Democratic party. I believe in most tenets of the Green Party and would support that within the frame work of the Democratic Party. That would give what you seek clout and the possibility of actually having your ideals part of a platform that can actually win the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neoma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm glad your no democrat too.
Edited on Sun Nov-21-04 05:08 AM by Neoma
really rude...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. No...Thank You.
Good luck in your endeavors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PittLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. Same people, same issues ...
different title.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
9. I WAS a green party member

contributed time and money too.

Then 2000 came along. I resigned the day after the "election".
The Green party and Nader are to blame for the last 4 years, and
IMHO, the next four as well. President Gore would have won
re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. No thanks
I'll stick with the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Blame game.
Blaming the Greens and Nadar for Gore's failures doesn't cut it.

The Dems are in disarray. They don't have a msg. and they pander to
the moderate Dems and Repub. lites. They have lost their way by trying to
appeal to those illusive "swing voters". When over 75% of the party was anti Iraq War the leadership ignored them and pandered to the right wing.
If a party cannot stand on principle then it is sinking in quicksand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. That ignores the context of the Iraq vote
The President wrapped in the flag and all. A vote against Iraq being spun as a vote against America. Support the president! We were only just starting to wake up from our 9/11-induced stupor at that point.

When I think back on that time, I realize I was talking much like Kerry. Granted he probably should have known better than to give Prez. Bush one more chance, but foreign policy and counter terrorism are big issues with him (made even bigger by being in the vicinity of the 9/11 attacks, I reckon). He wanted to see something done about the dangers he'd preached about for so long (he'd warned about Saddam back in 1997 on the Senate floor, though apparently no one was listening). And so he allowed himself to be convinced.

I remember saying to myself at the time, "Alright fella. I'm awake now. I will accept Powell's word for a while (and I did, too). But you do NOT have a blank check dated 9/11. There damn well better be WMD's in there." As soon as the spin went from "WMD" to "Liberating the Iraqis from the tyrant" I was starting to get angry. Then I heard about the detainees, and found out that the touching picture of the Iraqis taking down the Saddam statue had been effectively staged. I was becoming more and more incensed.

Right in the middle of my awakening, during the primaries, I heard Clark say "No blank check for the war" and I immediately said "THAT'S MY GUY!" That seems like it was forever ago. So much has happened. It feels like we've lived an entire decade in 2 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. The Greens Are A Joke...
Edited on Sun Nov-21-04 05:45 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
They have as much chance of wielding real power in America as Pamela Anderson has of growing a dick...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Not the quite the same way
I would have put it...

But true nevertheless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
18. Locking
Not in DU's best interests.

DU rules:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/forums/rules.html
We welcome Democrats of all stripes, along with other progressives who will work with us to achieve our shared goals.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC