Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clotures, filibusters and Frisk

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 11:01 AM
Original message
Clotures, filibusters and Frisk
Frisk just said he would change the cloture rules if Dems continued to filibuster judges...

Do we have to? It seems to me there is a rule in the Senate that if one Senator demands a hold on voting for a nominee, it's comes to a grinding halt. Lott did this back in 96 or 97 on the Senate floor. So instead of a filibuster, why can't just one Dem Sen after another raise an objection?

Or am I off base and it was something else Lott did?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
buddhamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm fairly certain the repubs changed the rules
Edited on Sun Nov-21-04 11:05 AM by buddhamama
on objections or holds with regards to nominees when they took over the Senate.

I'll do a quick search
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddhamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. rule changes
"Blue Slip Policy"

Hatch has also changed another fundamental Senate rule regarding judicial nominations. In the past, Hatch has been a fervent supporter of the Senate’s “blue slip” policy, which has allowed home-state senators who object to a judicial nominee to delay action in the Judiciary Committee by not returning a nominee’s “blue slip” to the committee. As American Prospect has noted, “it was Hatch, in 1995, who hardened the blue-slip policy to allow a single senator to block a nomination indefinitely.” Indeed, Sen. Hatch made his blue slip policy explicit in 1998 by stating on the blue slips themselves that “o further proceedings on this nominee will be scheduled until both blue slips have been returned by the nominee’s home state senators.”

Now, however, Hatch has apparently declared a new policy saying that even though a senator’s decision not to return a blue slip would be given great weight, it would not be allowed to prevent Hatch from moving nominees he wants to move. “In other words,” says Hatch, “we can go ahead with certain nominees where you might have a withheld blue slip.” Sen. Barbara Boxer has objected to proceeding on controversial nominee Carolyn Kuhl, but Hatch has scheduled a committee vote on the nomination on Thursday, May 8.--excerpt

you can read more about the rule changes here
http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=10520


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC