Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This is another example of why we are in the losing column folks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MSgt213 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 06:58 PM
Original message
This is another example of why we are in the losing column folks
Rights groups call for 'scrutiny' of Gonzales

Yea, lets put some scrutiny on a fucking law breaker for Attorney General but lets not opposed him. Just tell me when are we supposed to get fucking angry and so no fucking more? Idiots!!!!!


Coalition stops short of opposing nomination

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Many of the nation's leading civil rights groups expressed "serious concern" Monday with President Bush's nomination of White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales to be attorney general, calling for "close scrutiny" by the Senate.

But the coalition of more than two dozen groups -- including the NAACP, ACLU and Amnesty International -- stopped short of opposing the nomination.

Gonzales is expected to face tough questions during his confirmation hearings, particularly about a January 2002 draft memo he wrote.

The memo warned Bush administration officials that they could be held accountable for "war crimes" if they did not agree with the conclusion of Justice Department attorneys that the Geneva Conventions do not apply to al Qaeda and Taliban detainees held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/11/29/gonzalez.civilrights/index.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. and not with Harry Reid as our Senate leader
Guess he'd rather dance than fight. This guy wrote the friggin' torture memo and absolved * from any guilt he may have felt as he fried Texans right and left ... we shouldn't let this guy off easy; he could end up being WORSE than Asscroft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Shouldn't the questions and scrutiny come before...
...the decision to confirm the nomination? Why even bother with the questioning? Is it to give the impression that this isn't a RUBBER STAMP GOVERNMENT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC