Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let's try some re-framing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 09:15 PM
Original message
Let's try some re-framing
There has some converstaion here recently about George Lakoff and his ideas for re-framing the political diaglog to favor progressive issues over conservative issues. I am interested in concept because I think the concept of re-framing the issues has some merit. Then I saw the MoveOn letter about the DNC Chair today.

From the MoveOn letter:
"For years, the Party has been lead by elite Washington insiders who are closer to corporate lobbyists than they are to the Democratic base."

I have an idea. Let's start re-framing the words "corporate and corporation."

I believe, along with MoveOn, that the influence of corporations and corporate lobbiests in one of the most detrimental forces with our political system.

Any of you who are familiar with Thom Hartmann's material know that corporations were granted the legal rights of personhood by an aide's mistake transcribing a Supreme Court decision made back in the mid-1800's.

I suggest that in communications to the media, legislators and political people we start referring to corporations as "non-human entities" as a way to draw some attention to the idea that corporations are not, in fact, human beings and that they interests and priorities are not the same as those of people. Then we can start asking why our political leaders and legislators spend more time concerned with the interests of non-human entities than they do with human interests. Or why they spend more time soliciting funds from non-human entities. Or why they draft legislation that favors non-human entities. Or why non-human entities get tax breaks that people do not. And so on.

What do you think?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. We need to take one more step back...
I don't think most people even REALIZE that corporations are legally "people." We need to educate before we can reframe. In other words, we need to frame to begin with...

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. But wouldn't using a meme like "non-human entities"
get attention and lead into educating people about how much corporations control our political system?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdhunter Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. I like this a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. too bad you cant cripple a corporation just by breaking a knee cap
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Reframe: Vote "Switches" not "Glitches"
Glitches are random accidents. When computerized voting systems switch thousands, maybe millions, of votes all to the same candidate, that's no accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC