Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Media Matters said Russert mischaracterized Dean's position.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 01:32 PM
Original message
Media Matters said Russert mischaracterized Dean's position.
Edited on Mon Dec-20-04 01:36 PM by madfloridian
SNIP..."Dean had clearly stated that Democrats should change their "vocabulary" but not their "principles" on abortion, and that the Democrats are "the party of allowing people to make up their own minds about medical treatment."END SNIP

He edited the video clip apparently. Then he showed the edited clip to John Harwood.
RUSSERT: John Harwood, are Democrats rethinking their position on cultural, moral issues, on abortion?

http://mediamatters.org/items/200412200002
Videotape edit:

DEAN: I have long believed that we ought to make a home for pro-life Democrats. The Democrats that have stuck with us through their -- who are pro-life, through their long period of conviction, are the kind of pro-life people that we ought to have deep respect for. <...> But we can have a respectful dialogue, and we have to stop demagoguing this issue.

Transcript:
DEAN: We can change our vocabulary, but I don't think we ought to change our principles. The way I think about this is -- and it gets into the gay marriage stuff, too. We're not the party of gay marriage. We're the party of equal rights for all Americans. You know, I signed the first civil unions bill in America, and four years later the most conservative president the United States has seen in my lifetime is now embracing what I signed. We've come a long way. We're not the party of abortion. We're the party of allowing people to make up their own minds about medical treatment. It's just a different way of phrasing it. We have to start framing these issues, not letting them frame the issues.

I have long believed that we ought to make a home for pro-life Democrats. The Democrats that have stuck with us, who are pro-life, through their long period of conviction, are people who are the kind of pro-life people that we ought to have deep respect for. Not only are they pro-life, which, I think, is a moral judgment -- I happen to be strongly pro-choice, as a physician -- but they are pro-life more for moral reasons. They also, if they're in the Democratic Party, are real pro-life. That is, they're pro-life not just for unborn children. They're pro-life for investing in children's programs. They're pro-life for helping small children and young families. They're pro-life in making sure adequate medical care happens to children. That's what you so often lack on the Republican side. They beat the drums about being pro-life but they forget about life after birth. And so I do embrace pro-life Democrats. I think we want them in our party. But we can have a respectful dialogue, and we have to stop demagoguing this issue.

RUSSERT: And if you became chairman of the party, you would actively reach out to pro-life Democrats?

DEAN: I have -- in my campaign, supposedly this liberal campaign, we had a number of pro-life people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
clarknyc Donating Member (393 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of course he did.
That's how Little Russ does it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I never saw the video clip.
I watched the whole thing and read the transcript. That was really sneaky editing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TyeDye75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. SHOCK HORROR (shakes head in disbelief) /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC