Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Class warfare is endorsed by GOP/media when its rich screwing middle class

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 11:49 AM
Original message
Class warfare is endorsed by GOP/media when its rich screwing middle class
When the complete total factual picture does not fit the GOP/rich screw the middle class program, Bush and the GOP start to “Lie by telling a partial truth” – namely saying that there was a 47:1 ratio of workers to retirees when SS began and now there is less than 3:1. While 3 to 1 is a correct statement, it is also a meaningless statement if it is being used to say Social Security has a major financial problem. All these fear producing partial facts fold to nothing when they are included in the financial projections, and those financial projections then show there is no problem with Social Security.

The Actuaries say there is no immediate problem, and only a modest long term problem that may also not exist since to even get the long term problem the Actuaries used an out year 1.6% GDP growth assumption – about half the US historical result – and a higher GDP growth assumption makes even the 2043 (of 2052 if you prefer the CBO projection to the Soc Sec Trustees projection) problem go away. The key fact is that there is no problem to address – at least no obvious problem. The “Reagan demanded and passed in 84 increase in the Social Security retirement age from 65 to 67” stabilized the system to 2042 at least and quite likely forever. The current Soc Secururity Trustee Report projection of a low GDP out year growth assumption of 1.6% is a nice conservative assumption that gives an early warning if things are going wrong (via changes in the annual Soc Security Trustees Report). But using in the financial projections a more realistic GDP growth assumption that is more in line with US History shows everyone that there is no problem,and that therefore there is NOTHING TO FIX in Social Security. (Sourced as to facts:Congressional Budget Office Report "The Outlook for Social Security" at: http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=5530&sequence=0 )

There is no problem.

The private accounts do nothing to improve Soc Security current or future finances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
InvisibleBallots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC