Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just when you thought CNN was reporting on the election fraud...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 11:54 AM
Original message
Just when you thought CNN was reporting on the election fraud...
...with this headline from its ALLPOLITICS page:

NAUGHTY BOYS AND GIRLS

Recount goes bad
After checking the list a second time, the staff at "Wolf Blitzer Reports" finds a few more naughty moments than nice.


The story mentions NOTHING about election fraud. Apparently the "recount" refers to "checking the list twice," and the "naughty boys and girls" refers to:

Howard Dean did sort-of a naughty thing the night he lost the Iowa caucuses and screamed his infamous "Y-e-e-a-a-a-h-hhh!" The exclamation proved to be politically fatal.

John Edwards was nice. His whole persona was built around being nice. But nice guys sometimes finish last. Edwards couldn't even help the Democratic ticket carry his home state of North Carolina.

Teresa Heinz Kerry was a tad naughty when she replied "Shove it" to a journalist who had been highly critical of her. On the other hand, Laura Bush was nice in brushing aside Heinz Kerry's remark that the first lady had never held a real job.

And the hired guns who made all those attack ads for the Bush and Kerry campaigns were very naughty, highly negative and sometimes nasty. Unfortunately, naughty is often effective in politics.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/12/24/naughty.nice/index.html

Bashing all Democrats, all the time. Ne'er a discouraging word for Bush, so once again CNN lives up to its well-established reputation as a Bush-fellating organism...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MissBrooks Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why do they continue to do this to us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. AOL owns CNN. AOL is owned by a bunch of fundie creeps. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just don't watch CNN anymore and you won't know a thing about it.
No, CNN, no CNBC, no MSNBC, no NBC, ABC, or CBS. I come here to get my news, and will watch C-SPAN for the video fix, but that's it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who would ever have thought someone named Wolf Blitzer
would turn out to be such a goose-stepping little fascist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I watched him moderate a debate between Rev. Jackson and Falwell.
He wasn't a goose-stepping little fascist. He was more like great Aunt Matilda who was once sharp as a tack, but is now old, befuddled, wheezy and confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bu$h the Bad War Going Worse War..whisper or the Crash will come
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obviousman Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Don't you see, they are messing with us
The writer of that story knew what they were doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExpatriateTexan Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. A Modest Proposal
Can't start a thread yet, but ...

Since mainstream media (newspapers, news magazines, TV news) won't cover the election fraud story, how about if thousands (tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands?) of subscribers were to cancel their subscriptions citing this as the reason? Of course, boycott TV networks as well. If others think this is a good idea, spread the word and we'll take our money out of their pockets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC