Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are there any people left on this Earth who still think that....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bobweaver Donating Member (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 02:23 AM
Original message
Are there any people left on this Earth who still think that....
the people in Iraq were ever going to, and are ever going to, and ever would in a million years, submit to domination by the U.S. in any way, shape or form? Does anybody actually believe that they would buy Nokia phones and Verizon service and start eating at McDonalds and buying Nike shoes and Britney Spears records? Does anybody truly hold the belief that the Iraqi people - insurgents and citizens alike - are actually going to allow the U.S. and/or U.S. corporations to have control over the ocean of oil underneath Iraq? Anyone who believes this is completely ignorant of Middle Eastern peoples and their cultures. These people are much smarter and shrewder than the U.S. officials give them credit for. They see the U.S. as an occupying force that must be eliminated from their land. Anyone who still thinks that Iraqis see the U.S. as "liberators" is burying their head in the sand. And anyone who thinks the Iraqi people are going to "forgive and forget" the Abu Ghraib prison scandal is equally stupid and ignorant. The Iranian people have never forgotten the 1953 overthrow of their democratically elected prime minister by the CIA, after 50 years. Whoever thought up this stupid war in Iraq obviously has no concept or knowlege of Middle Eastern people and thinks they are a bunch of dumb munchkins or something. I have friends who are from Iran, Iraq, Syria and Turkey and after talking to them all about this, it is clear to me that everyone in the Middle East knows exactly why the U.S. military is there. I know most of the people on DU already know this, but are there still people out in the world who think that Iraq can be "Americanized" like the Phillippines was?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sushi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. I have no doubt at all
that there are plenty of ignorant Americans who think just that! The US will try to force its plastic culture on Iraq, but I hope the Iraqis will reject it. The thought of another country full of people drinking coca cola and eating at McDonalds and Starbucks and KFC and Wendy, etc., followed by obesity, is just disgusting.
* must think that all other countries want to be just like the US!
Ignorant westerners should know that there are plenty of bright people in the Middle East. They don't want to be led by *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. No, but ... what might have happened:
I agree with most of what you have written, but I also believe that the chances for some kind of neo con outcome would have been higher if the shrub administration had not been so incompetent. I find the incompetence of the shrubistas even more astounding than their overall unrealistic plan.

Shrub's representatives and military made utterly incomprehensible mistakes. They disbanded the Iraqi army, even though leading Iraqi commanders had secretly agreed not to fight in exchange for the US not disbanding the army. This created several hundred thousand unemployed soldiers and an embittered officer corp.

The street level tactics of the US military have been appalling. Reconnaissance by fire, numerous checkpoints manned by inexperienced American soldiers who scream at Iraqis in English and open fire if Iraqi drivers don't follow commands. Intrusive searches for "insurgents". Torture at Abu Ghraib. The absolute refusal to engage in political discourse with the Baathist party or other insurgent groups. Firing all mid to upper level Baath party members from all employment.

The list goes on and on. It was insane.

If the US had basically toppled Sadam and kept a discreet distance, guiding the Baath party and military to reform, democratize and retool, bizarrely enough -- scarrily enough -- the neo-con project might have been successful.

But then there would not have been massive contracts for the vice president's company, or a chance for Rumsfeld to try out new techniques of torture and civilian control, would there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. You're assuming the goal was peace... It is not...
We did not go to Iraq seeking peace, we went seeking retribution. We did not go for Democracy or to reap the spoils of war, we went to Iraq for War.

We're going to have to pay for these sins one day, I wonder what the cost will be. Will our children suffer for our mistakes, will we force them to pay the price? Time will tell...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left is right Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. "The children of my enemy
are the enemy of my children." Our children will suffer big time. God help them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. Not only are there people who think it will happen,
there are peoeple who think that it already has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bhaisahab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think there are about 52 million americans...
... who believe that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. Only in the US and only the truly stupid MFers.
aka bushbots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. Many of them don't believe, all for bad reasons. - 2 kinds of Reps
I believe there are two kinds of Republicans, those who are dumb, ingnorant, stupid and will believe ANYTHING told to them if it's related to "God" and the "cynical" kind.

Cynical Republicans are the worst. They listen to what Bush says, KNOW that it's a lie, but ACCEPT it because they figure what's being done is in their best interest.

Example: Before the war, Bush* talked WMD's, NOTHING about Freedom. Now it's ALL about "Freedom" but anyone with a brain (ie: those not in the prior catagory) knows that's it's total BS...

BUT THAT'S OK TO THE CYNICAL REPUBLICAN! They're the ones who figure that "WMD's" are what Bush had to say to get us there, and that "Freedom" is the facade which keeps for the international community. So why do they stick with Bush?

1) To 'send a message' to them-there rag-heads that stuff like 9/11 won't go unpunished. Sure Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, but they're all the same A-rabs, right? Hell, if they try sumptin' like that agin, nuke 'em!

2) Freedom = low oil prices and/or oil availability. The oil grab will (eventually) benefit the US in an international competition for oil which includes our rivals France and Germany.

3) There's "stuff" Bush CAN'T tell us because to reveal it would compromise national security. To reveal such info would let other countries know the depth of our intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. I know about 60,000,000 people that still think that.
Bush got roughly 60 M votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SweetLeftFoot Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
10. US domination
If they bought Nokia phones they'd actually be submitting to Finnish domination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. You beat me to it!
Nokia is a Finnish company, and Finland has the highest percentage of cell phone users in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SweetLeftFoot Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Nokia
Diversified from the lucrative toilet paper industry into phones and did quite well. I think Finland leads on mobile penerration but the UK leads on uasge.

The trill of personalised ringtones has replaced the song of birds when one walks down the street here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobweaver Donating Member (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Oops sorry, I should have said Qualcomm instead of Nokia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SweetLeftFoot Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Actually
nobody in their right-mind would want to use and US mobile service or handset. You guys are living in the dark ages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobweaver Donating Member (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. I put this same post on politics.com, and the right-wingers there...
...immediately accused me of being a supporter of Saddam Hussein!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 04:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. So there's your answer.
LOL!

They truly are pathetic little fools, aren't they.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC