Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Senator Barbara Boxer should be the one to step up tomorrow

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Zinfandel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 06:21 PM
Original message
Why Senator Barbara Boxer should be the one to step up tomorrow
Senator Boxer was just overwhelmingly re-elected to a six year term by a very liberal California.

Boxer will still be in office long after the idiot Bush is gone. She will win re-election again if she decided to seek another six year term.

The Republicans would be extremely hard pressed to punish CA for it, because it would put an enormous amount of pressure on the already unraveling of CA Republican Governor Musclehead.

Boxer would be a historical Senator, that would shatter this lying, cheating republican "mandate".

And Because it's the right thing to do for America.




(But she won't. like every other Democrat frighten of the Republicans.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
andyhappy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. and she is a strong woman! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. She got the third highest vote total in America. People will listen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Damn straight. It wasn't any "Focus on the Pharisees" group that
put her back into office. Or any disciples of the mullah falwell, either. It was US LIBERALS AND PROGRESSIVES in the VERY BLUE state of California who renewed her option for another six years. That's bigger than bush, and for longer than bush. And I intend to keep reminding her of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zinfandel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Great post calimary...I'm with you completely!
Edited on Thu Jan-06-05 12:43 AM by Zinfandel
I voted for her throughout her career.

On Edit: Spelling; (Wine induced). :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockerdem Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. No blue Senator is afraid of the GOP - thats not who they are fighting
The power elites, the corporate donors and the media can make ANY candidate look like Cynthia McKinney for a few months during an election season. That is why the US Senate is tame. They are people who have already won the golden parachute and intend to keep it. Cynthia McKinney's loss was a shot across the bow of anyone who doesnt toe the line. In fact, McKinney herself will be a lot more compliant on the issues that REALLY matter, you watch.

Remove the scales from your eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zinfandel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. However, your speaking about a Senator from a liberal state
Edited on Thu Jan-06-05 02:07 AM by Zinfandel
(and more liberal with each passing day), from CA, as opposed to a Congresswoman from a district in Georgia. Six years vs. two years, it makes a huge difference. Bush will fuck up, no doubt, and it all becomes academic after he's been out of office for two years.

Boxer would be able to offset the republican bullshit that would indeed be fired at her. Boxer is smart, tough & media savvy and Boxer will always have the bucks needed, as well as being well embraced in CA by the people (much more than Feinstein)...I mean to say, Gore & Kerry, both never spent a dime in CA and won by over 12 points. That must be taken into consideration.

Boxer is NOT a Tom Daschle, from a red state, a spineless, duplicit kiss-ass.

And no matter how you put it, Cynthia McKinney did win again and I won't sell her short to speak her mind. What would they use against her next time the same old shit?

What are you saying...no one should or could speak up?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wrote her about the 2000 election and she said to get over it.
Basically she said in a letter to me that we should get over the 2000 election and work with * to solve prolems. She would probably say the same today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
littleleaguemom Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Same Here
I had a long talk with someone in her office in 2001. Her Boxerette said, "The Senator has to choose her battles" and election fraud just isn't one of them. Nice, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. That was then. This is now. 2001 was a long time ago. And Welcome
to DU, by the way!

I called her office today - both in L.A. AND San Francisco, and made it clear: I am a constituent. I GAVE MONEY to her reelection campaign, as well as my vote and my activism. She won, handily, and now she's safe for SIX years. Now, she is the one with political capital to spend - indeed, more than bush, because she won by a larger margin. And as for me, I reminded them that I now expect a return on my investment. They seemed pretty receptive.

Besides, there was an email sent around to the Dem-CA groups today, quoting her as saying that, if enough of her constituents spoke up, she would, indeed, stand with Conyers tomorrow. So I made sure I spoke up. I called several other Dem senators, too, and Jim Jeffords, the Independent from Vermont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Any bets that any Senator will stand?
We are about to see a 2000 remix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Boxer is a tough woman, I hope she does...it's necessary . We'll ALL
stand behind her and give her all the support she'll need!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pstans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Schumer of NY
Schumer of NY is in the same boat. He just won reelection by a large margin a blue state. And the RNC won't do anything to hurt NY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
13. She'll stand
Remember, this is one of the few Senators who voted against BOTH IWR and the 87 billion and WON running on a liberal record. She's safe, she's got more balls than Daschle thought he had, and she will back that up tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zinfandel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'M SO HAPPY I WAS WRONG!!!!!
I'M SO HAPPY I WAS WRONG!!!!

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Bro, you were right about Boxer. And I'm happy too you were wrong...
yesterday, that Boxer should but wouldn't stand up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC