Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GP response to * inaugural speech

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 12:11 PM
Original message
GP response to * inaugural speech
If there has been an official demo response, I've yet to see it.

==============================================

GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES
http://www.gp.org

For Immediate Release:
Monday, January 24, 2005

Contacts:
Scott McLarty, Media Coordinator
Nancy Allen, Media Coordinator

GREENS CALL BUSH'S INAUGURAL VISION OF GLOBAL FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY A COVER FOR IMPENDING MILITARY AGGRESSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Greens responded to President George W. Bush's January 20 inaugural address with sharp criticism of his pledge that the U.S., under his second term leadership, will stand with "ll who live in tyranny and hopelessness" and "not ignore your oppression or excuse your oppressors."

"President Bush's vision of the U.S.'s mission to spread freedom globally should be understood as a justification for the invasion of Iraq -- initially based on lies that Iraq possessed WMDs, had colluded with al-Qaeda, and was an imminent threat to the U.S. -- and for possible future attacks on Iran and Syria," said Rebecca White,
2004 Green candidate for the New York State Senate (17th district). "Such a vision is a threat to global peace and security, because of its false premise that democracy and freedom can be imposed on a nation from the barrel of an invader's gun."

Greens charged that Mr. Bush's vision of democracy and freedom has little to do with liberation for oppressed and disenfranchised
people, and listed numerous first-term Bush policies and accomplishments that consistently demonstrated hostility to these principles:

-- The USA Patriot Act, canceling numerous constitutional protections.

-- Abuse of prisoners in Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib and disregard for the Geneva conventions and other international agreements.

-- The White House's doctrine of official secrecy, evident in Vice President Cheney's closed-door policy meetings with corporate energy
chiefs and Mr. Bush's initial refusal to cooperate with 9/11 investigations.

-- Mr. Bush's zeal for Attorneys General and federal judges willing to rescind constitutional protections; his support for a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.

-- The Bush Administration's continued friendly relations with murderous tyrants in Saudi Arabia, Uzbekistan, and Equatorial Guinea; reluctance to criticize China, Israel's treatment of Palestinians, and the erosion of democracy in Russia; support for the 2004 coup in Haiti; hostility to the democratically elected government in Venezuela.

-- Approval for trade pacts that allow antidemocratic international authorities to overturn vital environmental, labor, and human
rights protections.

Greens also noted the 2000 Florida debacle and 2004 election irregularities, documented in Ohio and New Mexico during the recounts launched and led by Green presidential candidate David Cobb,
which revealed the Republican Party's penchant for manipulating elections.

"President Bush's idea of global democracy and freedom is the spread of U.S. military dominance around the world and permission for U.S.-based corporations to gain control over foreign economies and resources, such as oil and fresh water," said Pat Driscoll, California Green candidate in a special election for Congress (5th
Congressional District) <
http://www.driscollforcongress.org>. "This
doctrine was applied in Iraq after the U.S. 'victory' in 2003, when Iraq occupation administrator Paul Bremer issued an order opening
up Iraqi businesses and resources to foreign -- i.e., chiefly American corporate -- ownership. The result was massive unemployment and the collapse of locally-owned Iraqi businesses, which
fueled the Iraqi insurgence."

Hundreds of Greens participated in the Inauguraton Day protests, and Mr. Cobb and 2004 Green vice presidential candidate Pat LaMarche
spoke at several rallies.

"Americans will remember that the Bush Administration threw an extravagant $40 million inaugural celebration while many U.S. troops in Iraq remain ill-equipped -- and that Mr. Bush never bothered to acknowledge all the American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan during his inaugural speech," said Tony Gronowicz, New York Green and editor of the policy writings of Oswald Garrison Villard in the book 'The Dilemmas of the Absolute Pacifist in Two World Wars.'


MORE INFORMATION

The Green Party of the United States
http://www.gp.org
1700 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 404
Washington, DC 20009.
202-319-7191, 866-41GREEN
Fax 202-319-7193

2004 Cobb/LaMarche Campaign: News on the recount
efforts http://www.votecobb.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not To Be Cynical
It is easy for the Greens to fight, they have a lot less to lose than the Dems.

Can anyone tell me why Dennis Kucinich isn't Green? Maybe he realizes it ain't easy.
(bad joke, sorry)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC