Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When we win in '08, our candidate should get the Cabinet he/she wants.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 07:05 PM
Original message
Poll question: When we win in '08, our candidate should get the Cabinet he/she wants.
Edited on Wed Jan-26-05 07:05 PM by Padraig18
Simple question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. well, if our candidates appointees arent architects of an illegal
Edited on Wed Jan-26-05 07:12 PM by jonnyblitz
war that they lied about to get us into, then i agree. it's not as generically simplistic as you are trying to make it seem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newsguyatl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good poll, Padraig18. You. Are. Back.
I voted 'Other' because I think General Clark or Senator Edwards or Congressman Kucinich are likely to choose a cabinet consistent with democratic principles.

And because a President Lieberman or Miller, perish the thought, might NOT choose such a cabinet.

If Bush had chosen John Danforth as his Sec. of State nominee, I doubt if 13 U.S. Senators would have voted 'nay.' Since he chose Rice, he got the fight he picked.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks!
I agree that he could have picked a less-reprehensible nominee, but I still don't think that it has been demonstrated that she is clearly unqualified (operative term) to be SOS.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cestpaspossible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Unless the nominee is demonstrably incompetent and dishonest...for example
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BornaDem Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Every president is entitled to name the people he wants to his...
cabinet and if they have been properly vetted and are not incompetent, the senate should consent to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Simple answer
Edited on Wed Jan-26-05 09:25 PM by Rowdyboy
Of course
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poppyseedman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. When we win in 2008, it will be most likely with a GOP controlled Senate
The President has the right to choose the nominee. It will be interesting to see how big of hypocrites the GOP senators are, when they get to play the role of so called "obstructionist" when that happens.

I might add the democratic senators should pick their current fights wisely. Fight the ones worth fighting for, not just to make political points that are in the end just symbolic and meaningless to a large majority of Americans.

Fighting Bush, tooth and nail on every issue, will only hurt us in the long run on issues we can't win.

Americans like to see their government working together, they expect differences of opinions to have a airing out so all voices have a say, not to be obstructionist for the sake of being able to.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. Unless they bring back elections, this is moot. Anyway, the Constitution
require for the Senate to confirm the nominations. I am with the Constitution - remember the days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
10. With evoting machines still in place...there ain't gonna be any
"we win." The repukes are in power until the machines are gone. They own us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. as long as the nominees didn't lie to get us into a war
where further incompetence made the cost of teh war higher and the liklihood of winning it lower.

Ohj, and competence. The nominee must be competent, something that cannot be said of two Bush nominees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
12. If we win in 2008...
If we win in 2008 (I was a pessimist for all of 2003 and most of 2004 until I got swept up in DU optimism the last 2 weeks of October...)

If we win, I am sure Republicans will remember and single out a few Democratic nominees for the Cabinet or other posts based on an out-of-context quote. (i.e., Jocelyn Elders, Zoe Baird, )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yes, unless they condoned torture, lied us into a disasterous war
or some other completely UnAmerican action. I don't see the Democrats fighting anyone other than Rice and Gonzales.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC