Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep. Mark Foley, R-FL: "I've talked to colleagues, they're panic-stricken"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 09:42 AM
Original message
Rep. Mark Foley, R-FL: "I've talked to colleagues, they're panic-stricken"


"President George W. Bush walks with FEMA official Mike Brown, left, and Rep. Mark Foley, R-Fla., right, through a Punta Gorda, Fla., neighborhood Sunday, Aug. 15, 2004."

Republicans Question Social Security Plan

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/social_security

Bush's proposal is also stirring worry in the House, where Republicans have often fallen in behind his programs.

"I've talked to some of my colleagues and they're panic-stricken," said Rep. Mark Foley (news, bio, voting record), R-Fla., who said he welcomes a serious debate over the sweeping changes Bush outlined in his State of the Union address Wednesday.

Two House Republicans with years of expertise on Social Security offered an alternate plan, saying the Bush proposal was too risky politically. They suggested bolstering the program with money from general revenues rather than the payroll tax.

"I think politically it's the most salable. It's not going to scare anybody," said Florida Rep. Clay Shaw, who for six years was chairman of the House Ways and Means subcommittee on Social Security. "It does preserve Social Security as it is today. If we're going to attract some Democrats, that's the way to go."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. How does this preserve SS the way it is today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The "salability" quote was in reference to:
Edited on Fri Feb-04-05 10:43 AM by Bush_Eats_Beef
"Two House Republicans with years of expertise on Social Security offered an alternate plan, saying the Bush proposal was too risky politically. They suggested bolstering the program with money from general revenues rather than the payroll tax."

...they are saying an alternate plan is needed to preserve SS, NOT the Emperor's Lucky Lottery plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
koopie57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. "too risky politically"?
What happened to doing what is best for the people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. They Haven't Read The Talking Points
The whole point is to destroy Social Security as we know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Taking money from "general revenues" is saddling taxpayers with debt that
is unsustainable and it gives this money to Wall Street--the only sure winners in Dubya's plan to "save Social Security."

Lindsey Graham's plan also would raise the cap on wages to $200,00 to privatize Social Security--not to save it. Unfucking believable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bush is in deep over SS - check this out,...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. No, the taxpayers are panic-stricken, mr. republican jerk.
They see you trying to steal their retirement pension. You, on the other hand, have a pension that works even if your ass is rightly booted out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
8. Look at WHY he's panic-stricken...
not because it's bad policy, obviously he could give two shits about that.

He's panic stricken because it's not "Salable".

Whether it's good policy or not, the republicans know their duty, it's to vote with the Chimp with lockstep discipline.

Spineless hosers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Absolutely
Was he "panic-stricken" over torture? Dead soldiers for a lie? Health care in shambles? Stolen elections?

Of course not - he's "panic-stricken" for the very reasons you state.

The hypocrisy of these bastards knows no bounds.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC