Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who were the 6 dems that supported Gonzales? eom

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Willy Lee Donating Member (925 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 03:11 PM
Original message
Who were the 6 dems that supported Gonzales? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here you go
(1) Senator Ken Salazar (Colorado).

(2) Senator Joseph Lieberman (Conn.).

(3) Senator Ben Nelson (Neb.).

(4) Senator Mary Landrieu (La.)

(5) Senator Pryor (Ark).

(6) Senator Bill Nelson (Fla.)

All red staters except Joementum

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I never understood gore picking lieberman for running mate
he helped to take down the ticket

with kerry - they might have gotten more votes so that Bush could not lie/steal and gore would be in his second
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A Brand New World Donating Member (803 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I fully agree. I never liked Lieberman as Gore's choice for
VP. I of course voted for them though. But I think Lieberman pulled the vote down to within stealable range. President Gore and Vice President Kerry would have been inaugurated for the second time last week without Lieberman on the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. They thought they could win the Jewish vote in Florida...
with Lieberman on the ticket. That was before he opened his big mouth and said we should count the illegal military votes that were cast after the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Was Gore also trying to offset suggestions that he was too liberal?
Or was the Jewish vote in Florida the whole enchilada, thinking-wise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. I thought it had to do with Joementum blasting Clinton during the Lewinsky
scandal and part of Gore's attempts to distance himself from Clinton's personal behavior.

What a waste that decision ended up being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Was it really so necessary to distance himself?
Wasn't Clinton still okay by Dems? Or were they pretty sick of him at the time too? I wasn't paying all that much attention at that point.

Ultimately I think it was a mistake not to use the Rascal King to his full advantage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I think it was a mistake. The Clinton fiscal and policy record was Gore's
best argument for being elected. When he tried to distance himself from Clinton's personal life, he distanced himself from the Clinton record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. He distanced himself right back to Tennessee, I think. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Gore was doom once he did that
Lieberman = republican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. Allow me to explain
Lieberman was the first to speak out from the Dem side against Clinton. He was a prissy moralist who betrayed his party to take some presumed moral high ground. To his credit, Joe is a tight-assed fundamentalist. To his calumny, he's a religious nut.

Gore was spooked by the outcry from the "faithful"; it's yet another example of playing to the right. They hate us, and they shouldn't be pandered to.

Gore was a coward; he was spooked by the outcry against Clinton's immorality, and he distanced himself from him. That was shockingly stupid, and the choice of Lieberman was evidence of it. What did Lieberman bring? Possibly Florida (hahahahaha) but he alienated much more of the South. Whither Tennessee? How about Arkansas?

Clinton, for all his mistakes, made life better for the weak, and Gore was cowed into running from him because of the prissy assholes being offended by him. It was stupid. It was why Gore lost.

If you need more clarifications, write back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Willy Lee Donating Member (925 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thanks- WL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I'm Very Pissed at Ken Salazar Right Now
As a County Assembly delegate and precinct chair, I helped get him elected. He let all of Colorado down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Mr. Salazar is getting a letter from me.
“In my view, Judge Gonzales is better qualified than many previous attorneys general,” said freshman Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Colo.

And what exactly makes him better qualified, Ken?


http://www.denverpost.com/cda/article/print/0,1674,36%257E115%257E2641697,00.html

snip...

So what does Salazar see in this guy?

"I'm particularly moved by his historical upbringing," the senator said, "the fact that he came from a place with 11 in his family all cramped into two rooms, his father with only a second-grade education." He went on to graduate from Harvard Law School, to become a justice on the Texas Supreme Court, to advise the president. Salazar said he was impressed with "the fact he's overcome those kinds of very significant obstacles to become a successful lawyer."

The lessons from a hardscrabble childhood are invaluable, Salazar said. "And his real-life experience will inform him in his role as attorney general," he said.

But a whole lot of his real-life experience has been as a loyal adviser to the president, one whose opinions often have provided legal cover - if only temporarily until the Supreme Court overruled them - for an administration bent on ignoring international law.

The concerns that Gonzales has appeared to authorize torture "are very serious questions that need to be asked," Salazar said. "And they are being asked in these confirmation hearings. He needs to explain his role."

There's a chance that information will emerge from the hearings that will persuade him to vote against Gonzales' confirmation.

"That's a distinct possibility," Salazar said. "But I'm hopeful that will not be the case."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. some expected
lieberman, basically a republican.

some not too surprising

ben nelson, landrieu, and pryor. they are pretty conservative.

bill nelson is an utter dissapointment. i will NOT vote for him next time. If he gets the nomination I will not vote for that office, period.

and salazar I dont understand. is it because gonzales is hispanic? if so that is a pitiful shame, that he cant see evil because its wrapped in a familiar disguise.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. We need to keep this list handy - and add that NO Rethugs voted NAY
There is no excuse whatsoever for supporting Gonzales in anything, let alone as the top lawyer in this country. The scope of this tragedy is nauseating and terrifying in its implications. The rest of the world knows what it means too, so our reputation as a nation that supports torture and concentration camps is reinforced. Of course, having Rice as Stepfordwife of State is another blow - she is "the face of the nation to the rest of the world" and is a proven, bloody-handed liar.

We need to remember the names of these Democrats and get them out of office. No excuses. They cannot be trusted again, if they every were.

And we also need to remember that NOT ONE REPUBLICAN stood to oppose Gonzales. Hello, McCain admirers? Please pay attention here. What does this say about how he really shares your values and is a tough, decent guy who fights for what is right? Think about it.

We will not forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissMeKate Donating Member (741 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. their rolling over WONT protect them.
they think it will, but they are still going to be challenged next round by repugs. I hate stupid political calculations like this. It doesnt work. Blue dog democrats have had their behinds beaten in red states all over the place- you think theyd learn by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Thats right- there is no "working with" liars, criminlas & smear artists.
These "DEMS" can be swiftboated by the GOP/media regardless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. I object to calling them DEMS w/o quotation marks.
Edited on Fri Feb-04-05 03:26 PM by Dr Fate
Lets not mix up pro-torture/Bush "DEMS" with real, stout-hearted DEMS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. So, are we all better regarding Feingold
Or is he still half in the doghouse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I support DEMS 100% when they reflect my values.
I put the pom-poms down when they do not.

Its that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. So you live in the inbetween?
There were those who were calling for us Wisconsinites to oust Feingold.

There's support and non-support. But if we're going to call for their heads, then cover them with kisses, then call for their heads again, this is going to get weird for me as a Wisconsinite Democrat with a maverick for a Senator.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. There will be no free-passes for moral ambiguity.
When a Democrat does somthing I agree with- I will say so.

When a Democrat does somthing I disagree with- I will say so.

Kerry is MY President, flaws & all. I have certainly decided to cut him a break for now- he has been great over the past week or so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. That's cool
I still have to deal with maverick boy, though.

I think you also have to look at a public official's overall stance when deciding if you will ultimately support them in an election.

Yes, Kerry the shadow prez has been doing pretty well. It helps me cope to support what he's up to, and I'm glad he's up to something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ralps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Hi LittleClarkie. Thanks for the vote-smart suggestion. Here is another
link that has been posted on other thread that I found really informative. It rate the various senators on their votes so far this year.
http://patrickhenrythinktank.org/sen-scores.html

:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC