Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NATIONAL CALL-IN DAY TO OPPOSE WAR SPENDING

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SmileMaker Donating Member (346 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:19 PM
Original message
NATIONAL CALL-IN DAY TO OPPOSE WAR SPENDING
Sorry if it's a repeat -- I've been working all day and haven't had a chance to read what's been happening here. Can't hurt to remind everyone to swamp the switchboard with calls tomorrow.

NATIONAL CALL-IN DAY TO OPPOSE WAR SPENDING
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2005

$80 BILLION MORE FOR THE IRAQ WAR?
NO WAY! BRING THE TROOPS HOME NOW

Contact your member of Congress: no new war spending!
Congressional Switchboard 202-224-3121 (9-5 EST)
============================================
This week George W. Bush submitted his 2006 budget request to Congress: a $2.5 trillion statement about the administration's plan to
slash social programs while increasing military spending. Yet not a single dime of his FY 2006 budget is earmarked for Iraq. Instead,
those costs will be hidden from the American people in the form of an $80 billion emergency supplemental request to Congress later this
week. The President's fourth supplemental spending request for the Iraq war will add $80 billion to the more than $151 billion already
appropriated.

When President Bush submitted his 2006 budget to Congress on Monday he said, "The taxpayers of America don't want us spending our
money into something that's not achieving results." We couldn't agree more. The people of U.S. can't allow Congress to pour more
money to "stay the course" of a tragic, failed war.

The U.S. peace movement and its allies have created tremendous openings in the debate on bringing the troops home over the past two
weeks. 55 percent of the U.S. public feels that the war was not worth it, Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey introduced an important
resolution calling on the U.S. to start withdrawal from Iraq, and Senator Ted Kennedy is raising critical questions about the need to bring
the troops home.

Our task now is to get ahead of the curve and send an early and clear message to Congress that their constituents will be monitoring them
throughout the $80 billion debate over the future of the Iraq war. Tell your Member of Congress on Wednesday that not one more dime
should go to waging war in Iraq. Instead, the U.S. must end the occupation, bring our troops home, and support Iraqi sovereignty. It is
time for us to demand that the Administration and Congress stop perpetuating the cycle of violence in Iraq, stop sending so many soldiers
and civilians to their graves, and stop diverting precious resources that could be used to rebuild Iraq and fund critical domestic needs.

Congress is expected to ultimately vote on Bush's Iraq supplemental in late March or early April. UFPJ will continue to send updates and
action alerts as the debate unfolds.

TAKE ACTION ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 9!

* Call, write, or fax your Member of Congress! Call the Capitol switchboard and ask to be connected with your Senators and
Representatives, 202-224-3121 (9-5 EST). We want to flood Congressional offices with calls from every district in the nation. For name
and contact information for your elected representatives, put your zip code into the space half way down this link
http://www.peacecoalition.org/action/index.html#urgentaction

See below for talking points.

TALKING POINTS
Tell your members of Congress that when they receive Bush's $80 billion supplemental appropriation request they should:

1. Oppose new funds: Congress should halt new funds for U.S. military operations in Iraq. Any new funds should be allocated solely for
troop withdrawal and interim troop protection.

2. End the occupation: Halt U.S. military actions immediately, shift U.S. troops immediately to the borders of Iraq, declare intention to
begin full withdrawal of troops, and leave no U.S. bases behind. Support the Woolsey (D-CA) resolution calling on the President to
begin the immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq.

3. Support Iraqi sovereignty: Give Iraqis full control over reconstruction funds, Iraqi ministries and government, and new police and
security forces. Terminate contracts with U.S. companies and turn projects over to Iraqis, and provide transparent accounting of all U.S.
contracts.

4. Stabilize Iraq: Commit to long-term U.S. financial support for Iraqi-led reconstruction and allow the UN and other international
agencies to support Iraq democracy free from U.S. intervention, and if the Iraqis want that assistance.

5. Provide real support for our troops: End the "stop-loss" policies that keep troops on active duty far beyond their contracts, and
overextend the Reserves and National Guard. Provide thorough psychological counseling, health care, and benefits to returning Iraq war
veterans and their families. Bring our troops home!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just think,if approved it runs out Sept 30th.....
Then Chimp can go back and ask for another $80 BILLION. Of course with their book-cooking NONE of it shows up on the Federal budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. some of us have jobs that demand our presence....
I'm a teacher, my job is far too important to me... and to my kids for the monkey king to keep me from doing it.... although he has done everything in his power to make it hard.

What needs to happen is all of the rich democrats need to pull their money out of the economy until they scream uncle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark08W Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Can't
Gotta be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Support a withdrawal timeline
If that's what we want, I don't know why we don't say so. I don't see how we can ask Congress to vote no on the money when we're asking them to keep troops in Iraq, pay for reconstruction and provide more veteran's benefits.

Say what you mean, mean what you say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC