Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Remember when Gays were considered security risks?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 11:28 AM
Original message
Remember when Gays were considered security risks?
Again, selective hatred by the Bush misAdministration and Repuglycans in general - they loved "Jeff Gannon".

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/1115-03.htm - "US Army Linguists Fired for Being Gay" - all able to speak fluent Arabic . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. They are...
...they know how many are in the republican party and might out someone who's trying to be morally superior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sporadicus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Gays Who Fabricate Elaborate Covers DO Represent a Security Risk
Edited on Fri Feb-18-05 11:50 AM by Sporadicus
Consider that gays in positions of power & authority who have gone to great lengths to cover up their sexual preference - marriage, children, etc. - are terrific targets for extortion. After all, they're willing to live a lie diametrically opposed to their nature in order to preserve their influential positions.

* is a case in point. Rumor has it that China has the goods on him and are extracting favorable trade arrangements in exchange for sitting on this knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsHammer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. What the hell is the rationale here? (Army, not your post)
I don't see why they'd fire people who have a skillset that we need desperately, just because they're gay. At a time where we're running low on troops, I would think that people who want to serve would be welcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC