|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 10:31 AM Original message |
Bush bans "divorced" Camilla from White House Visit /Charles Welcome! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
1. They're kidding. Right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
2. Maybe the Queen should ban war criminal Bush from state dinners |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 01:22 PM Response to Reply #2 |
30. Now that would be good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
3. But the Rush Limbaugh variance is still in place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tuvor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 10:36 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. All is forgiven and forgotten if you're a republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtLiberty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
4. Will they ban Nancy Reagan, too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 11:11 AM Response to Reply #4 |
17. I guess they also would have banned St. Ronny! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neweurope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
6. Sad times when one doesn't know anymore what's satire and what not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cally (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 10:39 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. I'm not sure either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tanyev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
7. Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
8. Coke hounds, pot smokers, draft dodgers, liars still welcome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 10:39 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Don't forget prostitutes (eom) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selteri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 10:44 AM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Stop insulting Pot heads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Exit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
9. "Sorry, Karl, I can't let you into the White House. You're divorced!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 10:43 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Divorced MEN are just fine! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Exit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 11:46 AM Response to Reply #13 |
20. Well, hey, everyone knows a lot of those divorced women are loose... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mizmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
12. I kind of doubt this story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catch22Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
15. Highly doubt this story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 11:21 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Here's what Buzzflash says about the article: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TyeDye75 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
16. Gay prostitutes with false names are welcome.../nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rockholm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
18. Um, George, CHARLES IS DIVORCED TOO, you dumbshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Exit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 11:47 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. OOPS! Omigosh, you're right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hector459 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
22. Let's start with Reagan, a divorcee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mandyky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
23. Newt, Newt, Newt, Newt!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 12:24 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Is IS a joke ---isn't it? has to be-even the WH would not do this (would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
25. Considering the rumors that have spread about BOTH Chuck & Junior recently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 01:20 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. OMG! I'd forgotten about Charles being discovered by Diana in bed with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benbow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
26. The Sun newspaper is not a reliable source |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunny planet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
27. Perhaps they should be banning half to three quarters of the right-wing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickinSTL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
28. what a load of crap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 01:22 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. It's because she's a Woman...RW Repug fundies don't like women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smirkymonkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
32. I thought Charles hated GWB and was none too shy about saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kskiska (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
33. I guess this means that Neil and Doro are no longer welcome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 02:23 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. And me. DAMN!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
35. OH, The HUMANITY!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truth2power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
36. What? You're kidding! This is from The Onion, right?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
despairing optimist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
37. Terriers don't get along with Rottweilers, I guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ianrs (121 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
38. wholly unreliable source |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
39. Sorry, this makes no sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NVMojo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-21-05 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
40. I don't care much about Camilla but what type of world does GWB |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC