Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is this really true? Are our hands tied?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Angry Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 09:21 PM
Original message
Is this really true? Are our hands tied?
Excerpt from the The New Yorker: Comment - News Hounds:

The non-Fox cable news outlets began to pick up on it last week; msnbc even assayed a special logo, “Gannongate.” A better name for it, though, would be “Nothinggate,” because nothing is what is likely to come of it. What all the memorable scandals of the past thirty years—real and fake alike, from Watergate to the Clinton impeachment—have had in common is that the opposition party controlled at least one house of Congress, which gave it the power to hold hearings and issue subpoenas. If Bush ends up having an easier time of it in his second term than any of his two-term predecessors since F.D.R., it won’t be because the scandals aren’t there. It’ll be because the tools to excavate them are under lock and key.


So what does it mean when the Dems write yet another requesting an investigation? http://rawstory.com/news/2005/index.php?p=117
Nothing at all????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
politicaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's illegal to lie to congress like SOTU 2003...
It would be fun to do a little lawsuit after he's finished.

That sounds like so much fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Posted my own thoughts, thank you for posting, Go Raw Story.
Edited on Tue Feb-22-05 09:38 PM by GetTheRightVote
I love the statement concerning the public trust going negative on the paid for media questions.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pstans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. If that is the case
then it makes 2006 all that more important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC