Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Operation "AWKWARD MOMENT" - How Liberals Can Affect Change in the Media

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 10:59 AM
Original message
Operation "AWKWARD MOMENT" - How Liberals Can Affect Change in the Media
Kurtz, Blitzer, Woodward, Novak, Limbaugh, Hume, O'Reilly, Brooks, Krauthammer and the other right wing media whores have the audacity to make their livings by sliming everything Liberal, yet they live and work in some of the "bluest" cities in America. They enjoy the culture, fine dining and all the other amenities of a liberal city while at the same time attacking liberals as traitors and scum. I think that Liberals need to start organizing a campaign to confront these people any place they might pop up. I liken it to the "Act up" campaigns of the gay activists of the 80's & 90's.

Even more effective would be a campaign to identify and confront the mid level and low level employees at these networks. The "stars" are well insulated against the slings and arrows of the general public and because of the vast amounts of money being paid to them, they are willing to say and do anything to keep the gravy train running on time. These low and mid level folks might not be so willing to suffer the stigma of working for such companies for so little pay. I am talking about the people that have a direct involvement in producing and airing the daily barrage of lies and slime. It is the producers, editors, reporters and copy writers.

In essence, if these media whores want to attack and slime everything liberal, they should be encouraged to do it from let's say Alabama or Texas or Mississippi. It is the height of hypocrisy that these people should attack everything liberal and still enjoy all the benefits of a liberal city.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds promising. So how do you plan to organize this?
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. No answer?
By the way, red state/blue state is a Radical RW frame, and whenever we use it, we advance THEIR agenda. The only real division in this nation is the one between the people and the greedy, manipulative corporatists.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
10.  I got plenty of answers. Even my answers have answers.
Edited on Wed Feb-23-05 11:31 AM by Vinnie From Indy
The only real division in this nation is the one between the people and the greedy, manipulative corporatists

What about the religious fundamentalist American Christian Taliban?

You might be right about the red state/blue state frame, but that seems a minor element in comparison with the cancerous effect of the daily serving of unvarnished propaganda Americans are receiving at the hands of these media outlets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. But do you have an answer to MY question?
You didn't answer it. I think your idea is promising, but it's going to require some organization. What's your plan?

The leaders of the religious right ARE corporatists in religious clothing, while the majority of their rank and file are tools that they're manipulating. Read "What's the Matter with Kansas" for more about that.

And the "red state/blue state frame" IS unvarnished propaganda that Americans don't NEED to receive at the hands of these corporate media outlets - BECAUSE WE'RE DELIVERING IT FOR THEM. So, while it was a side point, it's important to note, and let's stop promoting it.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I will heed your advice about red/blue state framing.
Edited on Wed Feb-23-05 12:05 PM by Vinnie From Indy
I also agree that the leaders of the religious right are "corporatists" in different garb using different language.

My purpose in posting this thought was to hopefully inspire people in those cities where these people and companies are located and also inspire people that have experience at organizing these things. I admit that I have my hands full trying to establish a liberal media outlet in a red....ooops, I mean very conservative leaning state.

Maybe there is an activist that will read this and know how to implement such a strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. I guess I don't understand. How is taking jobs and revenue away from
the blue cities going to solve the problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well I guess we could just do nothing.
We could just shut our eyes and continue to let these lie factories spew propaganda until the brownshirts are goose stepping through New York. Nothing is free in this world. My point is that these people should be stigmatized and ridiculed publicly for their involvement in the killing of American democracy. They should be made to THINK about what they are doing and maybe they can change things form the inside or leave those companies. It is extremely doubtful that these networks will pull up stakes and leave the "blue" cities, but that doesn't mean we can't make their endeavors to lie and deceive more expensive and less acceptable. My statement in the original post about going to Alabama etc. was just gratuitous embellishment. I do not think they would do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Well, just my opinion, but I prefer to support Media Matters, Air America,
other organizations, lots of liberal blogs, work with DFA/NY on framing and media relations, etc. And I have my eyes open when I do all of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. That's cool. Keep swinging your hammer and I will as well!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raenelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. I really believe we have to build our own media now.
Trying to reform the MSM is just like it sounds--pick up a hooker somewhere and try to turn her into marriage material.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. LOL ! How true ! Julia Roberts...line one! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. Damn right--Saul Alinsky would love it. Now we need names and
work places.

Also, the confronters would need a few guidelines--absolutely no violence or threat of violence, break no laws, etc.

Simply asking the con-whores "why they don't move to a red state where they'd feel more comfortable" by a lot of people repeatedly would probably get the message across.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. Boy do you have a good point or two
Edited on Wed Feb-23-05 06:16 PM by Eloriel
I'm not sure how comfortable I feel about espousing making them miserable personally, but OTOH, why the hell not? Why NOT make them feel the effects of their hypocrisy, incompetence, laziness, ineptitude, and general corporate sell-out/shill/fascism enabling and promoting performance? People are DYING because they're not doing their proper, CONSTITUTIONALLY-protected jobs of informing The People. Why shouldn't they get some rather rough (tho never physical) personal comeuppance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC