Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Response from Chris Cannon (R) UTAH re: Social Security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
UTdem Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 12:15 PM
Original message
Response from Chris Cannon (R) UTAH re: Social Security
Thank you for contacting me regarding Social Security reform. I appreciate your willingness to share your thoughts with me about this important issue.

The trustees of the Social Security Trust Fund have released a report indicating the fund will be exhausted in the year 2037. But the Trust Fund itself is merely an accounting ledger, containing government promises to pay future benefits when they come due. Whether one calls this situation a "crisis" or not, Congress should not procrastinate in examining and debating the future changes to the program now. The longer we wait, the more difficult it will become to make the necessary adjustments to ensure the program's long-term solvency.

During the 108th Congress, Representative Johnson introduced legislation that I cosponsored, which would allow individuals born since 1950 the opportunity to divert their share of the Social Security payroll tax into a personal savings account. Employers would continue to contribute their portion to assist in funding continuing benefits under the existing program, help pay transition and administrative costs, and fund disability and survivors' benefits. Under this plan, people would have the option to invest in personal retirement accounts set up much like the 401(k) plans offered by many employers, and by large organizations such as AARP.

None of the proposed bills in Congress would "privatize" Social Security. Nor would the president's proposal, though we do not yet have all the details. However, the establishment of personal retirement accounts for specific individual workers would allow younger Americans the option to build a nest egg for themselves and their children rather than build unrealistic expectations of benefits from the federal government that will only become more difficult to provide. Only significant reform of Social Security, together with a balanced budget, will guarantee solvency for future generations of Americans.

It must be pointed out that, despite the rhetoric that tends to accompany any discussion of Social Security Reform, there is no serious reform proposal under consideration today that would reduce benefits for those currently receiving them or who will be dependent upon them in the near future.

Again, thank you for sharing your thoughts with me, and please feel free to do so again in the future. For more information about current issues in Congress, please visit my website: www.house.gov/cannon.

Warmest regards,

Chris Cannon
Member of Congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. OMG, are you an actual Dem in Utah??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The letter is addressed only "That Democrat", and the mailman delivers it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTdem Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Stop and stare
People drive by and point all the time. LOL. I thought it was because we aren't mormon. I guess it's the anti-b*sh stickers on our cars and the Kerry sign we had in the front yard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Welcome to DU!
:hi: You gotta be a lonely creature out there in Utah...enjoy your visits to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Elizabeth Smart's family supports Democrats?
I think I read that in all the publicity surrounding her kidnapping. The extended family are long time Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Return response
Dear Rep. Cannon,

Your recent response to my letter regarding Social Security clearly confirms a refusal to be appreciative toward a majority of your constituents.

Duly noted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC