I kant reed so gud - Democratic Underground

kazoo35

(46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Feb-24-05 01:08 PM
Original message

I kant reed so gud

Edited on Thu Feb-24-05 01:15 PM by kazoo35

.

Forget it, I was wrong

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

googly

(801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Feb-24-05 01:10 PM
Response to Original message

1. I thought Churchill got his job because of his Indian ancestry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DrWeird

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Feb-24-05 01:11 PM
Response to Original message

2. Looks to me...

like he's just saying he's not really an Indian, and he's not really one.

Doesn't say anything about having Indian blood.

So looks like he's being pretty honest.

What that has to do with anything, i haven't the foggiest.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Goblinmonger

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Feb-24-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #2

6. I agree

He says that he has less than 25% Indian blood; he doesn't say he has none. That is a big distinction.

But, really, who cares. The right is using his comments about the WTC to attack someone they dislike for other reasons. Most of the people protesting him don't even understand what he was saying about Eichman. Not surprising that conservitives are asshats :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

kazoo35

(46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Feb-24-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message

3. False alarm, forget it, move along, nothing to see here...

Looks like I didn't read the page carefully enough. The link shows a retraction ON THAT SAME PAGE saying that they misquoted him.

Forget it.

Move along Johnny, nothing to see here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

donheld

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Feb-24-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #3

8. Thanks for admitting your mis-reading

Welcome to DU :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

donheld

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Feb-24-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message

4. Ward was right in much of what he said

Now about the Indian stuff, lying was not cool. I still support him and his right to speak the way he did.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Richard Steele

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Feb-24-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message

5. Self-delete; kazoo already found the correction.

Edited on Thu Feb-24-05 01:17 PM by dicksteele

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

kazoo35

(46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Feb-24-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #5

7. Please see post #3, thanks

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Richard Steele

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Feb-24-05 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #7

9. Sorry, slow typer here!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Freedom_from_Chains

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Feb-24-05 01:23 PM
Response to Original message

10. The paper that published this story has already retracted it.

http://starbulletin.com/2005/02/24/news/story3.html

The right so desperately wants to demonize this guy that they apparently will resort to lying to get the job done. Apparently someone must of had a camera or recorder to dispute their claim of the statement.

It's sad that the left is so willing to go along with this persecution but I guess that's what you get these days for pointing out the truth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:04 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.