Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP wants govt. to work with churches but NOT to help the poor and sick?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 06:45 PM
Original message
GOP wants govt. to work with churches but NOT to help the poor and sick?
Edited on Fri Mar-04-05 06:46 PM by blm
How the heck did they twist the word of God and Jesus AWAY from sharing with the poor and sick and onto > "Greed is good as long as you give some of the dough to your minister and the RNC."

???????????????????????????????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here is an interesting thread that touches on the Puritan roots of this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. More reasons why the NeoCon "Christians" don't give a damn about the poor
Edited on Fri Mar-04-05 07:04 PM by BrklynLiberal
and the sick..
The US is dominated by Calvinism brought here by the misogynistic Puritans, who may have been looking for freedom TO persecute, rather than freedom from persecution when they arrived on the shores of this Continent.(Do the words "SALEM WITCH TRIALS" sound familiar?)
It is interestng that Arthur Miller used those times and events as a parable for the McCarthy era in his play "The Crucilble". How appropriate is it for what is happening in this country right now?


Three Rules of Calvinism.

<snip>
ALTHOUGH CALVINISM WAS central to the faith of the Pilgrim Fathers, and its tenets remain embedded in more than one form of modern Protestant Christianity, few Americans consciously believe in Calvinist doctrines in a religious sense. Yet a great many, of all religions and none, who may know nothing at all about Calvinism as such, nevertheless act in accordance with its principles. How it came about that an almost forgotten religion has left such a powerful non-religious residue is a question that has been much studied and debated. What is beyond debate is the enduring authority of Calvinist values. However often overlaid by transient moods, however often proclaimed dead and buried, they remain vigorously strong just below the surface of American life, invisibly shaping everyday choices and fundamental attitudes.
<snip>
The Calvinist rules are simple, and binding. Rule Number One is for high-earning winners. Rule Number Two is for the great mass of working stiffs of varying affluence or poverty but all losers in their own eyes. Rule Number Three is for the non-Calvinists among the losers, most of them poor, who refuse to accept Rule Number Two.
<snip>
Rule Number One states that earned wealth is no impediment to virtue. That this rule contradicts the reported remarks of Jesus has been ignored. Likewise, the underlying Calvinist doctrine, which states that wealth is actually a sign of divine favor for the predestined, has long been forgotten. Yet this rule induces Americans to view the desire to become rich as most praiseworthy, and success in doing so as a moral achievement as well, for earned wealth is seen as the result of both sacrificial exertion in earning money, and self-denying restraint in spending it. Far from being viewed as self-seeking materialists, those who accumulate wealth are respected in rough proportion to the amount, so long as it is the fruit of their own individual efforts. As for the super-winners who earn the most fabulous amounts, they are greatly admired, more so than all other Americans, including the most famous war heroes.
<snip>
Rule Number Two: failure is not the result of misfortune or injustice, but of divine disfavor. Just as the ability to become very rich is next to sanctity, an inability to do so is next to sin, indeed almost sinful in itself.
<snip>
Many Americans who may be affluent but who cannot earn whatever amount of money they consider adequate and proper, are oppressed by a powerful sense of guilt. In a country that so greatly respects and admires high-earning winners, losers find it hard to preserve their self-esteem. A great many merely lead lives of quiet desperation, searching for distractions, eager to immerse themselves in whatever will take their minds off their failure, from vehement religion to televised sports. Others remedy despair with addiction to drink, to drugs, and above all to food -- the only fully legal, hence most widespread, addiction. Rule Number Two has powerful political consequences. It explains why the United States has never had a significant socialist party: losers blame themselves rather than the system, hating themselves instead of resenting the winners. It explains why no major presidential candidate has even tried to challenge the sharp inequalities of turbo-capitalism.
<snip>
The result is that in a country that is literally of the winners, by the winners, for the winners, the losers have no political expression of their own. Nobody denies it to them--it is the losers themselves who want so much to identify with winners that they deny their votes to any candidate who tries to represent their interests. So, many losers vote for one or another of the winners' candidates; others prefer not to vote at all, not only because of lethargy or ignorance, as the winners always say, but because they have nobody to vote for. In recent national elections, almost half of all the eligible voters of the United States did not bother to cast their votes.
<snip>
There are plenty of non-Calvinists among the losers, and mostly they are actually poor rather than just under-achievers by their own estimate. For them there is Rule Number Three: those who do not accept Rule Number Two, who are not paralyzed by guilt, and who are too uneducated to express their resentment in legally approved venues, are destined to end up behind bars. Rule Number Three is implemented very effectively in strict laws that prohibit many things which are allowed or tolerated in other countries, in strict law enforcement, and in long prison sentences including an abundance of 40, 50, or 60-year terms as well as mandatory life sentences without parole. Only the sadly impoverished and chaotic Russian Federation has as great a proportion of its citizens in prison as the affluent and well-governed United States. There were over 1.8 million Americans in prison at last count.
<snip>

more....
http://www.inequality.org/threerules.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC