Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

At first, I thought Hillary didn't have a chance in 2008, but....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:08 AM
Original message
At first, I thought Hillary didn't have a chance in 2008, but....
Edited on Sat Mar-05-05 09:16 AM by kentuck
after seeing her lead the fight to protect Social Security, that could be the issue that puts her in front. It depends on how much credit and recognition she will get from her defense of the SS program. If and when Bush is defeated on this issue, she may be seen as the person that lead his defeat. She has chosen her battle well.

I see SS as the issue that will take back the House and win the Presidency for the Democrats in 2008. The candidate that is at the front of this battle will be at the front of the race for the White House, in my opinion. Hillary has gotten off to a good start. I'm pleasantly surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. hillary still doesn`t have a chance
and i hope that she never ever decides to run for president..i`m to old to move to another country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Why would you wish to move if Hillary became president?
Is it because all of those right-wing nuts who believe the LIES about her would become more violent? What about her as President would you find so appalling? I think she is extremely arrogant but her heart is in the right place and she is extremely intelligent. Would be nice for a change to have someone in office that has a little depth of knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Hillary is Republican Lite.
She has helped to push the right wing agenda along. So tell me again why she deserves a vote from me?

I'd rather cut of my hand than to vote for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. I'm too old also, mad.
Dear Hillary stood up for black panther that tortured fellow member wanting out. He poured boiling water on guy for 3 days before shooting him in the head. Trying to find link. Anyone?

Used to admire her. But after the calls she's been making lately re: Syria and Iraq, just another repube in dem clothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwhite0570 Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. I like hillary but i don't
think americans will vote for a woman....just my opinion....she nneds to be ready to counter attacks from the repugs....they probably already have the attack machine revving up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. She doesn't have a chance.
I have yet to meet a single Democrat in real life who has indicated that they would vote for her in the Illinois primary; if she can't get Democrats in Illinois to vote for her, she hasn't got a snowball's chance in hell of getting the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I wont vote for her...
Edited on Sat Mar-05-05 09:28 AM by Andy_Stephenson
She voted for neverending war so I won't vote for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. How are you Andy? Hang in there! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. Did you say the same about Kerry and Edwards? They also voted..
Edited on Sat Mar-05-05 11:10 AM by Kahuna
for neverending war. I too would prefer a Dem who stood up to the bushies on the IWR. But if Hillary is the nominee, I will proudly cast my vote for her. If for no other reason than to see the spontaneous explosion of repuke heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. If Hillary is the *nominee*, I will also vote for her.
But that one hellaciously big 'if', IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. I hear the opposite in NY State.
In fact, I know a few Dems AND Republicans who hope to get a chance to vote for her for prez.

Of course, they're her constituents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohinoaklawnillinois Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. Count me in among those Illinois Dems, Paddy.
While I admire Hillary for all she's accomplished, she's too much of lightning rod to ordinary people.

A lot of ordinary Americans have fallen hook, line and sinker for all the BS the right wing has spewed about her.

Besides, 2008 is three years away. 2006 is 9 months away.

We Dems need to concentrate on the issues that are happening right now, i.e., Social Security, that horrendous Bankruptcy Bill, the War in Iraq and soon to be in Iran, making sure Patriot II doesn't become law and most importantly ensuring our future votes are cast and counted fairly and accurately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. Why do you say Hillary is leading the fight to protect Social Security?
I thought Harry Reid was leading the fight. The meeting, I assume you are speaking of, was held in New York, Clinton's home state.

The Senators are scheduled to go other states, including Nevada, if I am not mistaken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Very true...
She would have to lead the fight all over, not just in New York, to get the recognition needed to be considered a "front-runner"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. More on the Democrats weekend road tour...
Edited on Sat Mar-05-05 09:38 AM by flpoljunkie
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/05/politics/05social.html?pagewanted=all&position=

Democratic leaders amassed in New York and elsewhere nationwide as part of a weekend fly-around to counter the administration blitz, while the Democratic National Committee put up radio advertisements in the cities Mr. Bush has visited, and outside groups, including MoveOn.org and the AARP, stepped up their opposition strategies.

At their event in New York, Democratic senators acknowledged that the retirement system faced deficits in the longer run, but their only solution, suggested by Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts, was to scrap scheduled income tax cuts for wealthier Americans.

<>"If you take privatization off the table, we'll be happy to sit down and talk about the future," Mr. Reid said.

The Democratic road show, stocked with powerhouses of the leadership, was repeated in Philadelphia later on Friday. It is to visit Phoenix and Las Vegas. The first event was moderated at Pace University in Lower Manhattan by Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York. She was also joined by Senators Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the Democratic whip; Byron L. Dorgan of North Dakota, the Democratic Policy Committee chairman; and Frank R. Lautenberg of New Jersey, and by three private citizens who attested to the impact of Social Security payments on their lives and their fears that their benefits would be jeopardized by the Bush proposal. The Democrats called it a "conversation with America."

They argued that Mr. Bush's proposed solution is disproportionate to the problem, that the debate diverts attention from the budget deficit and from the lack of affordable health care, that the real motivation of ideologues in Washington is to shrink big government and to dismantle what Mr. Reid called "the finest social program in the history of the world" and that private accounts would further bloat the national debt and ultimately reduce retirement benefits.

Mr. Dorgan said commissions from private accounts invested in the stock market represented "a big wet kiss to Wall Street from the Bush administration."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. These people are wacked
"only solution, suggested by Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts, was to scrap scheduled income tax cuts for wealthier Americans."

He didn't offer it as a solution, he offered it as a fact. The tax cuts have caused these gaps more than SS has and that we could keep 2/3 of the tax cuts, repealing just 1/3, and fix social security with the difference.

Dems are making a HUGE mistake in not saying that this generation paid its own retirement though. Really pisses me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #15
26. If indeed, SS can be saved by repealing tax cuts for weatlhier Americans..
why in the hell don't the Democrats repeat this until they are "blue in the face."

It is a very strong argument. Bush could save Social Security, as a guaranteed insuranc program, with this simple step, but instead, he prefers to comfort the comfortable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Afraid of the label
Edited on Sat Mar-05-05 11:47 AM by sandnsea
Don't want to be tax and spend Democrats I guess. Kerry has been the only one to mention the tax cuts so far, certainly the one only who did yesterday.

Another thing, I finally get his proposal for a payroll tax holiday back in 2000 or 2001, I don't remember. I'm going to put something together on it later.

But jesus fucking christ, we had a surplus because of OUR payroll taxes. So, duh, we should have had a payroll tax holiday. Of course, if we had, people would be wondering what the hell we're doing with a SS problem NOW. They would have totally connected the irresponsibility of our government with our money and I guess we can't have that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Discord Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
13. doesn't have a chance IMHO
So instead of trying to fight just election fraud, corporate media, and a brainwashed general public... Let's try to get the first woman president elected.

YEAH!!! Great idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. I saw her yesterday
Dorgan, Lautenberg and Kerry were all better than she was.

I will never understand this board. Hillary is far to the right of Kerry, has done much less in terms of fighting Rice & Gonzales and other issues, is much more pro-Iraq war; but she's a hero and he's a villain. :crazy:

Just to be clear, I've always thought Hillary was an opportunist who stayed married to Bill to further her own political ambitions. She certainly isn't the worst Democrat ever and I'd definitely support her if she were the candidate, but I've never been a big fan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bush_is_wacko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
16. She doesn't. Trust me.
Hillary is unelectable. She has too much baggage and I'
Republicans WILL NOT VOTE FOR THIS WOMAN. No way, No how. And I know an awful lot of Dem's that would rather bathe in dog shit than vote for her.

I know she has a loyal fan base, but that loyal fan base is not enough to get her in office. I guarantee it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
17. her support of bankruptcy "reform" makes her a pariah . . .
as far as I'm concerned . . . that and her hawkishness on the Iraq war . . . she won't get my vote . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. You're right. A Dem with a record of fighting for the people will
have a chance. Hillary DOES have a record of fighting for the people. Hillary also has a record of fighting the repukes. She should not be underestimated at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
21. No Democrat who votes for SS reform can expect to still be called a
Democrat. I'm sorry, but this is a fairly fundemental economic issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
22. Yeah. It will be the same DLC mistake as Kerry.
More war! More war! WooHoo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MAlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
24. I dunno, I think we've had enough nepotism in that office fora few decades
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
25. That event was held in NY. Other Senators will introduce the discussion in
the other states. I think the Dem panel travelling is Durbin, Kerry, Reid and Dorgan.

Hillary did a good job on the NY event last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC