Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Condoleezza Rice: Dominatrix of State?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 10:37 AM
Original message
Condoleezza Rice: Dominatrix of State?
Edited on Sat Mar-05-05 11:23 AM by IanDB1
Condoleezza Rice's Commanding Clothes
by Robin Givhan
The Washington Post
February 25, 2005

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice arrived at the Wiesbaden Army
Airfield on Wednesday dressed all in black. She was wearing a black skirt
that hit just above the knee, and it was topped with a black coat that
fell to mid-calf. The coat, with its seven gold buttons running down the
front and its band collar, called to mind a Marine's dress uniform or the
"save humanity" ensemble worn by Keanu Reeves in "The Matrix."

As Rice walked out to greet the troops, the coat blew open in a rather
swashbuckling way to reveal the top of a pair of knee-high boots. The
boots had a high, slender heel that is not particularly practical. But it
is a popular silhouette because it tends to elongate and flatter the leg.
In short, the boots are sexy.

Rice's coat and boots speak of sex and power -- such a volatile
combination, and one that in political circles rarely leads to anything
but scandal. When looking at the image of Rice in Wiesbaden, the mind
searches for ways to put it all into context. It turns to fiction, to
caricature. To shadowy daydreams. Dominatrix! It is as though sex and
power can only co-exist in a fantasy. When a woman combines them in the
real world, stubborn stereotypes have her power devolving into a form that
is purely sexual.

More:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A51640-2005Feb24.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. *shudder*
Stepford of State straddles the Monkey for that Apocalyptic journey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. In Bushworld of the AntiChrist, Rice is the Demonatrix of State.
Edited on Sat Mar-05-05 06:08 PM by blm
heheh....pats self on back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. now cut that out!
LOL.....Demonatrix.....consider it stolen.

p.s. I only steal from the best.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's funny
I figured her up-tightness was from not being sexual enough!
That girl needs to get laid...but whom? Yuck.

p.s. this is NOT a sex thread..."locking"...}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. The BOOTS may be a sex 'n' power combo, but Rice ISN'T.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tarheel_voter Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Alfred E. Neuman lookalike?
Tell me I'm not the only one who noticed this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. ROTFLMAO!
Rice looks as though her face is caught in a state of permanent scowlage-- hardly someone who should be considered as a setter (or even an exalted follower) of fashion trends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. Huh?
Women of various shades and stripes wear to work pretty much what Condi had on, boots and all, every single day here in New York -- and probably every other urban environment around the world.

Why hasn't anyone pointed out we're bringing "our full sexuality" to our jobs and applauded us for it!

What a drooling snow job this article is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. That was part of the article's point n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. What was part of the article's point? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Stubborn Stereotypes and a woman's sexuality as part of her whole self

It is as though sex and power can only co-exist in a fantasy. When a woman combines them in the real world, stubborn stereotypes have her power devolving into a form that is purely sexual.


Here's a paragraph I didn't include, in the interests of not violating "The Four Paragraph Rule":


She was not hiding behind matronliness, androgyny or the stereotype of the steel magnolia. Rice brought her full self to the world stage -- and that included her sexuality. It was not overt or inappropriate. If it was distracting, it is only because it is so rare.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. It looks like we're having two different discussions here
My point is the writer seems to be drooling all over Condi as being powerful and sexy for wearing an outfit women wear every day -- it's like my wearing slacks, something women have been doing for years, and being hailed as wildly "innovative" for doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes, but you still have my sweater. When will you bring back my sweater?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Was that yours? :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC