Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Last gasp of the internet ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 09:57 PM
Original message
Last gasp of the internet ...
You do know that it is over, right? We are too close to the truth on the Bu$h regime. The web will be closed down. Mark my word.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
solinvictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. I worry about it. ..
I've actually purchased a Grundig crank power shortwave just in case the information is shut down here in Occupied America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Not a bad idea
got to look up something on those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solinvictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Accidental Dupe/n/t
Edited on Wed Mar-09-05 10:13 PM by solinvictus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solinvictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Lowe's Building Supply...
They run about $40 or so. It's a Grundig FR200 AM/FM/SW with a light, dual power from batteries or hand crank. I've also got a Coleman Freeplay AM/FM radio with a solar panel. An SKS, AK, AR-15, or other rifle should be part of the plan too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I have one too....
.... probably time to crank it a couple minutes and refresh the battery :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solinvictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I was surprised to see it.
The local Lowe's started stocking more preparedness stuff after Hurricane Ivan hit back in September.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Water filtration system...don't get caught being occupied w/o one. -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. Thanks I never would have thought to look at
Lowes. The rifle is something my son wants to get too. I have never had a gun in the house but right now it seems like a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU_ONE Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. No, they are not worried at all . . .
All this free flow of information has not stopped any bills getting passed that they wanted. No mass action by the people has the internet produced, except perhaps the demonstrations this summer? But they no longer fear demonstrations - they only look bad but "looks" don't really change much. It is only when masses of people withdraw large amounts of money from the system and stop participating in the economy, will they ever take notice that we the people may still have some clout. The people must organize out side of the political parties.

The power of the people has been almost completely usurped. And there is very little time before all is usurped. We are just spectators for the most part. With all this free flow of information the election fraud is still in effect and the war machine still goes on. And it's not even politics as usual but politics, even more destructive to the working people. What is this the 3rd season of American Idol?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickinSTL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. they no longer fear demonstrations
Isn't one of the reasons for that the fact that the MSM never covers them? And when they do, they underreport the number of demonstrators?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
European Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. I agree
Why clamp down if your winning anyway-keep the appearance of a democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. And if that happens...
Revolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Oh, That Would Be
SWEET! I remember the Good Old Days when REVOLUTION really worked!

It can't come too soon. Got to remember, there are Freeper/Creepers who use the Internet too! Do you really think it will come to this?? I must admit I have worried about it, and I wouldn't put it past them either. Some of the things they've gotten away with are truly amazing.

Too many Americans following a CORRUPT Pied Piper!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankly_fedup2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Since Bush thinks there is more than one internet, we could
easily pretend that he took our favorite one away. LOL.

Just kidding. I really don't think he can take it away from the whole World.

He can try (here come the new taxes of the 21st Century) to tax the Hell out of it, but I do not think he would be successful in the next four more years of Hell.

What the Hell are we talking about here? I cannot believe we are even discussing such things. Now that IS scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
34. we just gotta shut down the bad internets
and keep the good internets.

Want some timber?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankly_fedup2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. Oh, I heard that went belly up, just like everything else Bush has . . .
touched . . . including this country. (Idiot)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegexReader Donating Member (183 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
46. only if
you've got the guts for a Fallujah style fight.

RegexReader
$USA =~ s/Republican/Democrat/ig;
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. There was something on Judy WoodWhore today on this
I wasn't paying too much attention at the time, but Judy WoodWhore on CNN had a brief segment about some members of congress who want to exercise control over the blogs. Apparently, the Republicans are upset that the Democrats have discovered an ability to raise campaign funds through this medium. Did anyone else catch her show to find out who these guys are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solinvictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. No..
But it's been coming for a few months. I've heard the Pukes are tired of an uncontrolled and unedited means of information transfer. I guess controlling all the rest of the media's not enough for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankly_fedup2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. This would be the final frontier for them getting rid of free speech.
Every time something comes up that will affect the Republican' s who put this man back in office, I want to gleefully laugh at them and tell them they have done a fine job in supporting this administration. It's a shame that even with all of your support, he will screw you as fast as he will any of us on the left. He has no dignity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. So what
are they going to do about Canadian blogs and sites and Europeans etc? They can't control them. This is ridiculous. So what are they going to do? Fine democrats who use the interent with websites and blogs? I wonder what Mr. Dean has to say about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. The Federal Election Commission & the campaign finance reformers
want to apply rules to the blogs. May involve tracking donations obtained by candidates due to links on a blog, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. This..
... I'm afraid I don't believe.

Even the proledummiat would then realize what a bunch of pig fuckers these guys are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. No, I don't know that its over, or that the web will be "closed down"
What makes you think something like this is possible, let alone imminent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. It is something I worry about
but the thing to remember is how many people all over the world use the internet. So how could they take down a message board with people coming from all over?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Just block it in the country
like China. China blocks BBC (among others) country wide. There are some key points in the network that could probably be blocked. If servers are overseas, they would still run, but nobody in-country could get to them, though other countries could get to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
20. Good thing we have other internets then
We just have to figure out how to access them. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed_gov_eye Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. I worry about it. ..
Why would we, I mean they take away your internet access?

This isn't China you know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Gosh, is this Agent Mike?
We've been wanting to talk to you....

Yes, this is the Land of the Free!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed_gov_eye Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Just checking
Negative, Mike was replaced. The higher ups felt he had been compromised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #25
44. So who are you?
And we miss Mike, can you tell him we said hi next time you see him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
26. LikeThe Line In The Color Purple Says . . .
"I can smell the rain coming."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
28. It would be very easy to sell the idea of shutting down the Net
to the Ami public. Just tell them terrorists are using the net to communicate with each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed_gov_eye Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Hmm
I like the idea of taxing the internet better. More money for us to blow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #28
38. Not a chance - profit trumps everything, remember?
And the I-net is nothing if not profitable for the corporatists.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. I'm sure there are ways of structuring things
to retain profitability while eliminating unprofitable ventures like blogs & liberal BBS's. Like maybe filter everything thru AOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
30. yeah and the billions in commerce with it, unlikely
that can't stop the one without destroying the other. Billions are spent on the internet daily, whole companies like e-bay and amazon do all of their business on the internet. Even if the government chose to filter which sites are allowed and which are not, those of us that are part of the are not allowed will stop using the net altogether. Zero internet shopping on my part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Ding, ding, ding...
We have a winner. Thanks for cutting through all this paranoia and injecting some realism into the conversation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
31. Nah....probably just all the search engines!!!!!
Hallburton will take over Google, Enron gets Yahoo....and so on and so on. All the stuff we find now will be purged, leaving only nice, fluffy, warm stories on the chimp regime. Then we will get 24/7 on cable news how this is a WONDERFUL thing to have happen <cuz, after all, the search engines are enable us do the media's JOB for them and then QUESTION them...so they, too, will be thrilled w/ the changes>.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
35. Sorry . . .
Edited on Thu Mar-10-05 01:52 PM by Heidi
but as an American living abroad, I can tell you that the world does not revolve around the U.S. president. If it did, he wouldn't have gotten by with the truck-load of crap that he so far has gotten by with. The Internet doesn't revolve around the doofus, either. I'm reminded daily that we Americans, even we good Democrats, are not the center of the universe.

(Edit for typo.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Guy Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
36. I don't think the web will be closed down.
However any Progressive site or any site even slightly non flattering to bush will be shut down. They will use the Patriot act to shut us down and make our websites and blogs illegal. There is a reason the right wing nut jobs have been labeling us as non American and supporters of the enemy. People will have heard that enough to believe it so when they come for us the masses will accept it. Hopefully they will see through it and won't stand for it to happen but, they already have let this bastard steal three elections. 2000, 20002, and 2004. bush needs to be stopped before this can happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
39. They can't close it down. Nor do they need to.
They'll just co-opt it, like they did with television and radio. It's already happening. Get the corporate-backed sites and a network of sympathetic personal sites to spin in concert and American perceptions will be skewed as readily as they are by FOXCNNABCCBSMSNBCCLEARCHANNEL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
40. First it is dangerous, second it is full of porno, then CNN will/has
report of a companion internet being developed that is "safe". This one will be "Family friendly", easier to use with new Microsoft programs, very secure for your online shopping and such.

Think about how the groundwork was laid by the Fundamentalists in the late 80's and during the 90's. They construct the issue, then frame it it perfectly, then quietly start to work, and VIOLA! Bush is a two termer and we have a group who voted him in on moral issues, according to propaganda.

The government/theocracy is patient. We are not going anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
42. Bawhahahah...can I have your worthless cable modem??
I already have one but what the hell..if you have one you won't need it anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #42
47. No, because sites like these will not be on the "new" internet.
"The New Internet, officially known as Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6), has been mandated by the U.S. Department of Defense, as well as by other countries, to replace the existing Internet standard (Internet Protocol version 4 or IPv4), which has been in effect since 1973. IPv6 promises vast improvements in security, multimedia transmission, and mobile and wireless online operations, as well as enabling the Internet-based networking of billions of addressable devices that will create many new commercial products and services. Details of this transition, and the many important challenges and opportunities that it holds, will be presented at the conference."



http://www.innovations.harvard.edu/news/4080.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Yeah,I'm real worried......
Not....

It only took 50 years to get the resolution upped on TV's and it only took 50 to get that "TV that you can hang on the wall"

So yeah...I'm shaking in my boots at the possibilty that DU and a MILLION other sites(many running E commerce) will be gone in the blink of an eye. Ain't going to happen...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
43. Good luck
You realize how difficult it would be to shut down the entire internet, to shut down every single server in the US and overseas? Good freakin' luck on that! The best they can hope for is discrediting us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
45. Bush won't shut the Net down -- maybe control what you read, like the MSM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
48. If you have a phone line and a dial up modem you are still connected.
They could block data transmissions coming IN country over the main trunks, but you can still access within the US. I think that they could probably make life hell for sites like this one--harassment of the owners and membership--but if there is an interest in keeping it going it will happen via emails and mirrored sites.

I think of this entire internet as being comparable to a circulatory system. There is a heart or (central point) that would be the phone system here in the US. There are also main data transmission hubs (comparable to veins and arteries) and there are individual data lines that would equate to capillaries (that's us!) They can't completely shut down any one area for long and keep the organism alive.

Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
50. The sky is NOT falling & the web will NOT be shut down.
Watch out for all those cups of coffee in the morning. Nice P2 pic. If you were in the Navy back then, that means that you are old enough that you need to cut back on the coffee. I hope you aren't making it as strongly as the Navy does. That stuff will peel paint. Of course that's how chief's maintain their "sunny" disposition, by drinking that stuff.

Seriously, the net can't be shut down without bringing the economy to a halt. Even W supporters would howl if anything were done to the net.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kohodog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
51. There's always the darknet. We will survive.
http://slate.msn.com/id/2094336/

See You on the Darknet
Why we don't really want Internet security.
By Paul Boutin
Posted Wednesday, Jan. 28, 2004, at 12:40 PM PT

snip

"I have a game I play whenever I read an essay on politics written by a techie: How long until the first reference to George Orwell? Autodesk founder John Walker, in a recent 28,000-word monograph ponderously titled "The Digital Imprimatur," wastes no time: His piece is subtitled "How big brother and big media can put the Internet genie back in the bottle." If your eyes don't glaze over right then, they will as soon as Walker begins to explain how by signing up for cheap broadband service, with its firewalls and dynamic IP addresses, you've already compromised your freedom."

snip

"An ad hoc alliance of techno-rebels covertly transferring unauthorized data in defiance of network authorities—sound familiar, Neo? It's such a popular scenario that the same Microsoft researchers leading the company's secure computing efforts wrote a paper two years ago describing this inevitable backlash, which they dubbed the darknet. The darknet! Jeez, are they trying to make piracy cool? Who'd want to hang out on the boring old Internet when the other kids are on the darknet? The term has been picked up by mainstream publications including Rolling Stone, which defined darknets (plural) as "file-trading networks created by and for small, private groups of people." Instead of relying on KaZaA, these groups use programs like WASTE that let them swap wares on discrete networks without being remotely tracked. Even a cop with a subpoena would be hard-pressed to detect such a network's existence.

Microsoft's paper flatly warns that trying to shut down these networks could backfire:

There is evidence that the darknet will continue to exist and provide low cost, high-quality service to a large group of consumers. This means that in many markets, the darknet will be a competitor to legal commerce. From the point of view of economic theory, this has profound implications for business strategy: for example, increased security may act as a disincentive to legal commerce."


Sorry for s disjointed quote, but as long as there is access to phone lines there will be options. The internet has the capacity to evolve beyond what we now use and understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
52. Sites that could be "shut down" overnight.
Invoking the Patriot Act and the suspicion that certain sites were being used by "terrorists" to pass messages, the NeoCon justice Dept could shut down and sieze all property at:

1)Democraticunderground
2)buzzflash
3)democrats.com
4)Any LeftWing website that allows anonymous posting

I would be lost without these sites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC