|
. . . the voters repudiated US occupation. They had an opportunity to endorse it by voting for a slate headed by Bush's water boy, Iyad Allawi, but gave it only 14% of the vote. Instead, they chose a slate headed by Islamic fundies that calls for the US to set a timetable for withdrawal and repeal Bremer's decrees.
I wouldn't call the Iraqi elections a victory for democracy. The kind of Islamic republic that will result from a transitional government dominated by the United Iraqi Alliance is not, in my opinion, one based on democratic principles. Of course, a colonial puppet doesn't represent democratic principles, either. There was no strong democratic choice on the table for the Iraqi people.
Rather, this was an endorsement of nationalism. The Iraqi voters would like to have Iraq's destiny determined by Iraqis for the benefit of the Iraqi people, not by neoconservatives in Washington for the benefit of wealthy Americans.
|