Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SAVE THE ARCTIC REFUGE TALKING POINTS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 01:36 PM
Original message
SAVE THE ARCTIC REFUGE TALKING POINTS
* The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge's 19 million acres comprise one of the last places on earth where an intact expanse of arctic and sub arctic lands remains protected.

* Drilling in the Arctic Refuge can't make even a small dent in meeting America's energy needs. U.S. Geological Survey scientists estimate that there is very likely only enough oil to supply America's needs for six months. And oil companies admit that, even that, won't be available for at least 10 years.

* An irreplaceable natural treasure, the Arctic Refuge is home to caribou, polar bears, grizzly bears, wolves, golden eagles, snow geese and more. Millions of other birds use the Arctic Refuge to nest and as a critical staging area on their migratory journeys.

* Of course, the Arctic Refuge supports more than wildlife. For a thousand generations, the Gwich'in people of Northeast Alaska and Northwest Canada have depended on it and lived in harmony with it. To them, the Arctic Coastal Plain is sacred ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fryguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. will someone answer me this......
why has the results of the only exploratory well drilled in ANWR been kept secret? do the members of congress who are voting on it even know what the estimated deposits are?

and why the hell isn't anyone talking about addressing the demand side of the equation - raising fuel standards, increasing efficiency, etc. - instead of only the supply side as a way of reducing our "dependancy on foreign oil????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressiveBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And yet Bush turns it around
Wasn't it last week when Bush said that he wouldn't tap the strategic reserves because it doesn't fix the problem? I wonder what problem he is REALLY referring to then.
Why is it that the #1 oil consuming nation is also the only one that doesn't realize how much death our oil fixation brings on us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC