Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate puts Oil Companies First in Fight over Arctic Refuge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:01 PM
Original message
Senate puts Oil Companies First in Fight over Arctic Refuge
Edited on Thu Mar-17-05 01:02 PM by quinnox

Statement by NRDC Legislative Director Karen Wayland

WASHINGTON, D.C. (March 16, 2005) -- Today the U.S. Senate, by a vote of 49-51, defeated an amendment by Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) that would have removed a provision of the Senate budget bill that authorizes energy development in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The following is a statement by Karen Wayland, legislative director at NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council).

"Drilling the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge won't make a dent in gas prices at the pump or break our dependence on Middle East oil.

"This was really a vote for Big Oil, not for the solid majority of Americans who oppose turning America's last great wilderness into a vast, polluted oil field.

"President Bush and his Senate allies resorted to a sneaky budget maneuver to get their way. Now, Congress is one step closer to trading away an irreplaceable national treasure for a few drops of oil that we wouldn't see for a decade or more.

"If the oil industry can drill in the Arctic Refuge, then no place, no matter how pristine, will be safe.

"But there is still a lot of political tundra to cross before this fight is over. We'll keep battling every step of the way.

"Increasing America's energy security doesn't require selling off our natural heritage and letting oil companies despoil our last best places. Using better technology in our cars and trucks -- so they go farther on a gallon of gas -- would save more than 10 times the amount of oil in the refuge, and save consumers billions of dollars at the pump."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. the most interesting/perplexing/scary aspect of the debate
Edited on Thu Mar-17-05 01:06 PM by izzybeans
on the floor was a major point of the dems. That big oil had been pulling out of attempts to drill there and the repubs were in fact attempting to pry open Pandora's Box so that nothing is off limits.


Thanks for the article! I'm glad that message is spreading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC