3 times the USSC declined the Schiavo case..why is bush trying to destroy

ElsewheresDaughter

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-21-05 10:39 AM
Original message

3 times the USSC declined the Schiavo case..why is bush trying to destroy

the Judical Branch???

I am so confused

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

BlueEyedSon

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-21-05 10:40 AM
Response to Original message

1. That's a RHETORICAL question, right?

Why indeed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Norquist Nemesis

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-21-05 10:40 AM
Response to Original message

2. So He can "save" it? n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Dhalgren

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-21-05 10:41 AM
Response to Original message

3. They are nihilists, in essence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

annabanana

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-21-05 10:43 AM
Response to Original message

4. so he can rail against "activist judges"

Edited on Mon Mar-21-05 10:47 AM by annabanana

This will help the RW paint us as "legislating from the bench" (In spite of the fact that it is, really, judging from the legislature.)

They turn it around and smack us with it.......again.

Remember, the base doesn't CARE about facts! We have to shout about Bush's signing a bill in Texas that says HMO's and Insurance Companies are allowed to PULL THE PLUG without family consent!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

TahitiNut

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-21-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #4

7. Exactly right. Gotta get them judges approved by the Senate, dontcha know?

:thumbsup: It's the long Night of the Living Dead ... ambulatory brain donors.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

BrklynLiberal

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-21-05 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #4

9. As opposed to the judges that put * in the White House in the first place.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

trotsky

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-21-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message

5. Consider also this is the party of "state's rights."

And we see how willing they are to let states decide certain things (like presidential elections and the right of a person to die in peace).

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

BrklynLiberal

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-21-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #5

10. The party of the 'sanctity of marriage" is fighting against the husband

having the ultimate say in the decision over his wife's fate, and siding with her parents.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Contrary1

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-21-05 10:47 AM
Response to Original message

6. So brother Jebbie

can make it a tri-fecta...or would that be tri-f*ckedya?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

BrklynLiberal

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-21-05 11:19 AM
Response to Original message

8. To rally the Fundies and try to save the Congressional seats they are

Edited on Mon Mar-21-05 11:20 AM by BrklynLiberal

doomed to lose in '06 because everything they are doing in this country is turning to crap.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:46 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.