Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wasn't it Dubya and Baker during the (s)election of 2000 that kept . . .

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
frankly_fedup2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 02:28 PM
Original message
Wasn't it Dubya and Baker during the (s)election of 2000 that kept . . .
repeating over, and over, and over (ad nauseum) that, "This is a Country of Laws and we have to follow the law." Or something pretty similar to this.

I guess we are a country of "laws" only when the law leans in their favor.

Otherwise, these judges are all Liberal extremists.

OxyContin Limbaugh said that "the Liberals" (I love it how he knows what we think and how we feel) agree this will exonerate Rehnquist from his previous decision of Gore v Bush when it's time for his eulogy. I wonder what will be said at Limbaugh's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes
Funny.

I was just thinking about that same thing....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. And wasn't "Rule Of Law" a battle cry during the Clinton Hunt?
It wasn't about the sex, it was about the lie?

Shrub lies us into a war; thousands die. How few really care about the deaths OR the lie....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankly_fedup2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Exactly. It was about the "law" then as well. Good one. Maybe . . .
we should remind them with a fax?

Anyone afraid of getting audited?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. And bush was all for state's rights and personal freedoms and the
sanctity of marriage before he got elected too.

Now we're all terrorists if we don't cower before him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. tsk tsk. but THAT was the Truth THEN. THIS is the truth NOW....

Oceania was at war with Eurasia now, but just four years ago, these two had formed an alliance against Eastasia. Winston remembered this clearly, but it made no difference what he or any other individual remembered, for the Party said that Eurasia had always been the Enemy and what the Party said was the Truth. This, thought Winston, was the most frightening aspect of the party regime-that it could obliterate memory, turn lies into Truth and alter the Past. The Party slogan was “Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past.” This was where “doublethink” came into play, minds were trained to hold contradictory positions simultaneously and unquestioningly- for example you had to believe at one and the same time that Democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy. Winston could remember a time when the Party did not rule, when Big Brother had not become all-powerful; but according to the Party they had always existed and this lie was repeated ad infinitum until it “became” the truth. This, Winston thought was a far more terrible weapon in the hands of the Party than torture or execution.

George Orwell "1984"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankly_fedup2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I wonder who read this book to Dubya? He sure has excellent . . .
recall on how to actually be a dictator, don't you think?

Well, at least we know he has been read book other than "My Pet Goat." (who the children read for him).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. I thought they were overruling the states on that one too, though.
Remember? They lobbied for a federal intervention in a state court case. Florida law called for a Gore victory, as I recall it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC