Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Someone call C-SPAN and tell that ignorant Jeff Sessions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 08:35 AM
Original message
Someone call C-SPAN and tell that ignorant Jeff Sessions
that Frist himself fillibustered a judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm seething with anger. Sessions is a bastard.
Why does he hate America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. I think he's still pissed
because his own nomination to be a federal judge was rejected by the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. No no no. You have it all wrong. When republicans filibuster,
it's "protecting the constitution and defending America".

When Democrats filibuster, it's "stalling the government" and "forcing their agenda on an America that spoke loud and strong in the last election that they want things done the republican. LOUD AND STRONG!" and "purely childish reaction to the fact that they lost" and "proves their utter disregard for the authority of the president and their unwillingness to work together with anyone."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, wow, now the Rs are getting concerned about
the textile workers here AFTER they allowed their jobs to go to China and other countries. NOW we're supposed to believe that they think we need to be tougher in our trade policies. Let's burn down the house and yell fire when it's reduced to rubble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. What did he say this time?
Everyone in Alabama knows he's an idiot and we don't pay much attention to him.

I do like to call his office and say very sweetly, "I saw the Senator on the television again today. Please tell him not to do that. It's embarrassing for us back here at home." :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. May I ask,
Edited on Wed Apr-06-05 08:47 AM by Skidmore
who the heck votes this man into office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Those people who vote for anyone with the (R)
after his name. Unfortunately, there are lots of them here. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. what hypocrites

Frist wasn’t always so opposed to filibustering judges. In 2000, he eagerly joined a coalition led by Bob Smith (R-New Hampshire) to fillibuster the nomination of Justice Richard Paez, who was nominated in 1996. The only saving grace is that Frist & co. were so out of the mainstream that the fillibuster failed and Paez was confirmed anyway.

The mention of the Clinton era suggests a potential solution to the crisis. Many of Clinton’s sixty unconfirmed nominees were blocked not by forty Senators, but by one, using a procedure known as an anonymous hold, or “blue-slipping.” (Judge Ronnie White, a moderate endorsed by Rush Limbaugh’s brother, was blue-slipped by a Senator later revealed to be John Ashcroft.)

The Democrats could agree not to filibuster any judges if the ability to blue-slip judges is restored. It would then take only one Democrat, not forty, to block all of Bush’s twenty egregious re-nominees—and many more besides. I wonder if the Republicans will take them up on it.

http://machlin.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC