Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Not another dime for the Iraq "war"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 09:54 AM
Original message
Poll question: Not another dime for the Iraq "war"?
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:

"Some will say this is to support the troops. If the administration cared about our troops, our troops would not have been begging for body armor and armor-plated vehicles.

"Some will say we must rebuild Iraq. Yet $9 billion in funds that would have helped rebuild Iraq are missing, unaccounted for. Some will say we must not cut and run, but they have no exit strategy and permanent bases are being built in Iraq.

"Some will say our cause is right, holy, and we are bringing peace and freedom to Iraq. I say the war was wrong, unholy, and the administration has brought death, destruction, chaos, and disruption to Iraq.

"The Bible says 'that which is crooked cannot be made straight.' This war is crooked. It cannot be made straight. Not another dime for this war and for all those who have profited from it. Not another dime."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. No more money until a full accounting of the $160 billion allocated so far
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Giving an incompetent administration more money is a waste.
That a competent administration could, hypothetically, make some good out of this mess with a few more years and a few more hundred billion is irrelevant.

Bush & Co are going to screw it up. No more money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. No more money WITHOUT AN EXIT PLAN!!
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. would you require the Plan to include a timeline?
the problem i've seen with all the "Exit Plans" is that they all seem to have this kind of "we'll train the Iraqis and then we'll leave" ...

we'll be saying that for the next 25 years ...

show me an "exit plan" that gets us the hell out of there in 3 to 6 months and count me in ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. I like what some of the groups are saying...
Edited on Wed Apr-06-05 11:42 AM by ClassWarrior
That we need to stay and rebuild - obviously - but that we need to pull the troops out IMMEDIATELY.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. "We" ???
when you say that "we need to stay and rebuild - obviously", i'm not clear what you mean ...

are you suggesting that continued US presence (i.e. occupation) in Iraq is necessary or is your point that the US has an obligation to help support UN efforts to rebuild Iraq? if the US maintains a presence, I, for one, don't trust that it would be for benevolent reasons ...

we have a huge obligation to help but no healing can occur until the US totally withdraws ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Here's a plan:
Round up all US troops in Iraq, have them get their gear together, load everything up on transports and fly them the hell out of there! How about that "exit plan"? Anyone who says we have to stay for some altruistic reason is either deluded or lying. Load 'em up and bring 'em home!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. I have said all along, that you don't "support the troops"
by facilitating their killers. The reason US troops are being killed and maimed in Iraq is the US government's policies and any support of those policies works against the troops. US out of Iraq now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. please help keep this poll kicked ... thanks ... and read this !!!
and consider this ...

some have justified voting for the additional $81.4 billion on the basis that it will go to "support the troops" ... let's say there are roughly 150,000 troops in Iraq ...

if we gave every single troop $1000 to buy gear, that would total only $150 million (that's million not billion) ... if we gave every single troop $10,000 to buy protective gear, that totals $1.5 billion out of an $81.4 billion budget request ... if we gave every single troop $100,000 to buy protective gear, that would total $15 billion out of the $81.4 billion ...

and let's be real ... the troops are NOT going to be given that kind of money by the bush White House ... and that still doesn't come anywhere close to spending the $81.4 billion ...

the reality is that spending money "to protect the troops" is a totally specious argument ... the Pentagon budget is more than $400 billion ... isn't that money supposed to be used to "protect the troops" and buy them the necessary protective gear? ... that's a big $400 billion budget the first year of the Iraq war and another $400 billion in the second year and now another $400 billion as we begin the third year and that does NOT INCLUDE the additional $200 billion supplemental funding we've already spent on Iraq ...

add up 3 years at $400 billion per year plus an additional $200 billion ... that makes $1.4 TRILLION (that's a whole lot of zeros) available to buy a bit of protective gear for the troops in Iraq ... and now they want more money ????

anyone who votes additional funds for Iraq and exploits the needs of the troops as a justification can go to hell ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Not One More Dime!
http://www.kucinich.us/floor_speeches/iq_notonemoredime.php

Not One More Dime
Dennis Kucinich speaking from the Floor of the House

Link to this entry in the Congressional Record
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi?position=all&page=H1512&dbname=2005_record

March 16, 2005

"Mr. Speaker, today the House is going to be asked to approve a supplemental appropriation of $82 billion, most of which will go to continue the war in Iraq.

"We now know more than 2 years later that Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction which was the immediate occasion of America’s intervention. We know that Iraq had neither the intention nor the capability of attacking the United States. Yet this country has spent over $200 billion and today is determined to spend another $82 billion in furtherance of a war we did not have to fight at great cost of human life, the lives of our troops and the lives of innocent Iraqi civilians.

"Yet while we are contemplating going ahead and spending $82 billion, we should be thinking about the fact that on January 30 the Special Inspector General for the Iraq reconstruction issued a report that the administration’s Coalition Provisional Authority mismanaged $9 billion in a development fund for Iraq funds. Not a single penny of the $9 billion could be accounted for by the Inspector General.

"The development fund for Iraq consisted of Iraqi oil revenues intended for reconstruction and humanitarian efforts in the war-torn country, but they cannot account for a single penny of it.

"Now this government is asking for $82 billion, most of it for Iraq. They could not account for a single penny of the money that the Coalition Provisional Authority, their authority, was responsible for. How can we give them another dime when they cannot account for $9 billion?

"We have people who do not have decent education in this country, decent housing, our highways are falling apart except for our transportation bill. We need to focus on why they do not and have not produced a single shred of evidence of what happened to that $9 billion. The American people have a right to know."

http://www.kucinich.us/floor_speeches/iq_notonemoredime.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kick, for the troops
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC