Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The Nation" .com is taking submissions to the New Republican Dictionary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 11:51 PM
Original message
"The Nation" .com is taking submissions to the New Republican Dictionary
Katrina vanden Heuvel at The Nation (Editor's Cut) is taking submissions for a book to be published soon, the article below and at this link (besides being awesome) explains the "project."

The Republican Dictionary, IV

02/08/2005 @ 4:42pm

In Bush's State of the Union address, he mentioned personal accounts seven times but private accounts zero times, which is interesting because only a few months ago he was using both terms interchangeably. But fear not, this was no mistake. The Republicans tested the phrase private accounts and found public support was much lower than when the same, exact, identical concept was called personal accounts. (Personally, I like caring accounts, but they didn't ask me.)

So the White House and its paid spin doctors, many of whom play journalists on TV, have taken to the airwaves to push the phrase personal accounts and chastise anyone in the media who employs the banished words to characterize ther Administration's Social Security agenda. Proof, if more was needed, that language is power and debates are won or lost based on definitions.

But here is the really funny thing about the personal/private accounts debate. Not only are they not personal accounts, they're not private accounts either. They are in fact US government loans. (Bear with me now, because this will only hurt for a moment.) You see, your payroll taxes will still be used to cover the benefits of current retirees, but under Bush's scheme the government will place a certain "diverted" amount into an account in your name. It sounds like a personal retirement account, but it's not. It's a loan. Because if your account does really well (above 3 percent), when you retire the government will deduct the money it lent you (plus 3 percent interest) from your monthly Social Security check leaving you with almost the same amount you would have received under the current system. If your account does really poorly (below 3 percent), you are out of luck. According to Congressional Budget Office, the expected average return will be 3.3 percent, so the net gain will be zero.

But wait, it gets better...
(clip)

So our government will have to borrow that cash. And if the last three years are any guide, our largest single loan officer will likely be the Central Bank of China. And who runs China's Central Bank, China, and the Chinese people with an iron fist? Why, it's our old friends, the democracy-loving, freedom-marching Chinese Communist Party. So Bush's personal retirement accounts=private retirement accounts=US government loans=US government borrowing=Chinese government lending=Chinese Communist Party loans.

Or as we like to say in Republican Dictionary land:

PERSONAL RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS, n. Chinese Communist Party loans.

(more at link above, including more new definitions)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kevinmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Submitted this one:
Skunkmuncher-- Republican Staffer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. White House Press Corp --

overpaid, glorified stenographers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. That's one of my favorite
Edited on Fri Apr-08-05 10:26 AM by Up2Late
White house Press Corp- n. a gaggle of stenographers and mindless Parrots, who, by agreeing with and always repeating the White House Talking points, are allowed to tag along with the President.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joefree1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. Stalking Points
Stalking Points: Also known as "bait and switch," Rethuglican attempts to divert any logic based discussion of politics with inflammatory non sequitur.*

This technique forces the opposing debater to "stalk" the rethug through a wilderness of inflammatory insults, labels and accusations with no pause for factual debate.


* Following a statement with totally unrelated statement.
http://www.ediablo.com/rethugdictionary.html


Seating now available in the Smoking Section:
Politics, humor, death and the Devil - http://www.eDiablo.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Katrina vanden Heuvel
Rocks! :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. My contributions:
More definitions for the Republican dictionary:


ethics -- an archaic concept embraced only by those do-gooders in the Democratic party.

Clear Skies -- polluter's bonanza that increases toxic mercury levels by 500%. Orwell would be proud of this double-speak.


Energy policy -- Drill, drill, drill, preferably in places of pristine natural beauty. Gourge consumers with price hikes and market manipulation at every opportunity. Oppose all policies to increase conservation, as we want people to use as much oil as possible to keep our friends, the Saudis, as well as our cronies at Exxon-Mobile living high off the hog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. "Cooling the Mark Out" Keeping the religious right from realizing that
they have been used by neocons - and that none of their issues will be addressed. AKA Terry Schiavo personal legislation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anakin Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. Hah Hah Hah. Rethuglican Voters
are such idiots to have voted in the geniuses who planned this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC