Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

$7,782,816,546,352.29 -- Forget the Social Security "crisis."...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 10:40 PM
Original message
$7,782,816,546,352.29 -- Forget the Social Security "crisis."...
(Below are just some of the best paragraphs from this article, I encourage everyone to click the link below to read the rest of this great article, with these paragraphs in proper context)

From: The American Prospect - Online Edition
$7,782,816,546,352.29
Forget the Social Security "crisis." The number above is the crisis you should worry about.


By Terence Samuel
Web Exclusive: 04.08.05

This week, President George W. Bush went to the Bureau of Public Debt, in Parkersburg, West Virginia, to make the point that there is no Social Security trust fund -- nothing there that can be really counted on. All it is, he said, was a bunch of IOUs. Parkersburg is a river town near the Ohio border, where the Ohio and Little Kanawha Rivers meet, and it is something of an irony that the one presiding over the largest explosion in federal budget deficits would use the Bureau of Public Debt as a backdrop for his plea for solvency in Social Security...

(clip)

Without the budget resolution, those proposals face Democratic filibuster and will likely die. Regardless of how it is sliced and diced, we are looking at an annual deficit of $368 billion this year and a 10-year projected deficit on $1.35 trillion, according to the Congressional Budget Office. And none of these numbers include the cost of the continuing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan...

(clip)

These days, there is nothing on the table worthy of the name “deficit reduction,” but there is growing concern. Conservative GOP budget hawks in the House -- embarrassed by the tarnish that the deficits puts on their reputation as the party of smaller, cheaper, more responsible government -- have been challenging their leadership to more aggressively address the deficit problem. The comptroller general of the General Accounting Office, David Walker, has been saying the solvency problem in Social Security is essentially a small stream headed for a much bigger river.
“First, financial challenge is a subset of our nation's financial and fiscal challenge,” Walker told a House tax panel recently. “Social Security has an estimated unfunded commitment in current dollar terms for the next 75 years of $3.7 trillion. … That compares with a roughly $43 trillion problem for our country.”
So the problem is not just that Social Security may not be able to mail out monthly checks someday in the distant future but that, more perilously, the federal government may find itself so mired in debt that the whole economy just slowly grinds to a halt...

(clip)

...The day Bush was sworn into office in 2001, the national debt was $5.7 trillion, and there was a surplus. On the day he showed up in Parkersburg, it had climbed to $7,782,816,546,352.29. That is seven trillion, seven hundred and eighty-two billion, eight hundred and sixteen million, five hundred and forty-six thousand, three hundred and fifty-two dollars, and twenty-nine cents.

But it’s just an IOU.

(much more at link above)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Indykatie Donating Member (416 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for Posting
Good Read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donailin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Drunken Fratboy
drives country into ditch.

what else can one say. every possible thing he can do wrong, he does wrong and then some. JUST. LOOK. AT. THOSE. NUMBERS.

<sick to my stomach that it's come to this>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. The next president will have to address
this, and it won't be easy, and he/she will probably be hated for addressing Bush's screwups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm starting to think, the RePukes do this on purpose...
...that way, they can say, "See, we told you the Democrats would raise your taxes!"

That's the main reason I hope the economy collapses very soon is, so they have to fix it themselves, or they get labeled as worst than H. Hoover.:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donailin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. they're still blaming everything that is wrong on Clinton
no kidding, they still say things like, "because the previous administration's policies didn't . . blah blah blah"

Bush could be president till 2020 and they'd still do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. No problem
I love this quote from the Newsweek reporter,

Newsweek’s Robert Samuelson envisions it as an “and economic and political death spiral.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Kick n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC