What is this MSM is reporting the Dems, and Reid are

saracat

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Apr-23-05 05:11 AM
Original message

What is this MSM is reporting the Dems, and Reid are

Edited on Sat Apr-23-05 05:41 AM by saracat

making a "deal" about the nuclear option??? They are promising some court appointments or a supreme court appointment to nix the debate . It seems the Dems will look bad if they close down the Senate and the Repukes will look bad if they concentrate on the filibuster while gas is high! This stinks to high heaven. That deal is no deal at all! I am getting mad all over again. Anyone know if this is true?

On edit- I hope these are RW talking points and only rumours!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

LatePeriduct

(660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Apr-23-05 05:16 AM
Response to Original message

1. Better be more right-wing spun lies....

That sounds like a horrible vision.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

saracat

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Apr-23-05 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #1

2. I heard this on two stations and I am beside myself. This had better NOT

be true. We have made enough deals with the devil.We can't afford to give an inch on this. We are in a really good position with this . Even the repukes are nervous. Deals should not be necessary!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

EFerrari

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Apr-23-05 05:23 AM
Response to Original message

3. I thought of something today.

Remember when Pelosi endorsed whatshisname for Party Chair instead of Dean? What IS his name -- pro-life, horrible record on women's health issues? He was on the 9/11 commission.

Anyway, today I thought that maybe she did that so the Rethugs would go after the wrong target, to buy time. Because Nancy would never have really backed that other guy. (Damn, my brain won't give me his name.)

Maybe there's a little bit of maneuvering going on here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

saracat

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Apr-23-05 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #3

5. Tim Roemer, and Reid endorsed him too!

And they did "really" back him. Roemer was furious not to get the chairmanship. It had been promised. Dean just appointed him a party spokesman. I was really disappointed in that appointment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Name removed

(0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Apr-23-05 05:36 AM
Response to Reply #3

6. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

saracat

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Apr-23-05 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #6

7. I don't know that she is a sell out. I just wouldn't agree on Roemer.

Don't know if they are making a "nuclear deal" I hope this is Rw talking points!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

BeFree

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Apr-23-05 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #6

8. That's a serious charge...

Do you have any facts to back up your assertion?

She's committed as many ethics violations as Tom DeLay

I didn't think so....

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

CanOfWhoopAss

(776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Apr-23-05 05:23 AM
Response to Original message

4. If it is true, the Dems Balls are turning to rainsins in the glare

of the sheep driven media.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:01 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.